|
|
|
Dawn F. Collins
{K:560} 7/5/2001
|
Altaf, I can see, in my minds eye, exactly what tipping the camera down would have done for the shot --- much more interesting. I see now that I have an automatic tendency to center things vertically when I take my pictures. (I don't have trouble with assymetry horizontally, in fact I prefer it.) What speed of film would be best for this type of shot? 200? Any input you care to provide I will gradly accept. Thank you so much for your help. I think this site is wonderful!
|
|
|
|
al shaikh
{K:15790} 7/4/2001
|
Ditch the 400 film for these landscapes, definately get a tripod, and consider the angle from which you place your camera a little downward tilt on this shot to incude some more water would have made it a lot more interesting. PS just because it's blurry does not mean it's bad, just make sure it's what you intended, take a look at the street shot with an umbrella in my portfolio it may cause you to rethink some stuff. (same advice was given to me a long time ago so I'm just passing it on)
|
|
|
|
|
Dawn F. Collins
{K:560} 7/1/2001
|
Okay! a tripod goes on the shopping list and becomes my new best buddy.
|
|
|
|
|
Artie Colantuono
{K:12275} 7/1/2001
|
you already know the answer to this Dawn...image is also underexposed...cool idea and good attempt but...I own A great deal of photographic equipment, probably over a hundred grand...Hassys and lights and grip stuff and nikon and large format and all.....my best friend is my big ass heavy cumbersome huge TRIPOD...get a tripod and like American Express Says "don't leave home without it"
|
|
0 
