|
|
Jan Graziano
{K:17920} 5/9/2005
|
Weird, Mary - the photo I attached was a reduction of a copy, etc. etc. and the flowers looked awful in the upload - not at all like the original - but I didn't want to spend much more time looking for the original than what I did spend. Anyway. I agree. The original frame was too busy for the flowers, and the plain black is much better. Live and learn. Practice, practice. Try, fail, try again. Jan
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 5/9/2005
|
Yes, Janice--better. The left flower is not cut off and the darker background seems to be more effective with this.
Mary
-
|
|
|
|
|
Jan Graziano
{K:17920} 5/8/2005
|
Peter, you and Mary are on the same wave length - let me see if I can attach a different version to this reply to you. See what you think.
|
Version 2 |
|
|
|
Peter Daniel
{K:33866} 5/8/2005
|
Wonderful Photograph Janice, Great colors, clarity and Composition. I feel the outer part of the frame is too clear, maybe extend the edge haloing...
Thanks for sharing?
Your friend, Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Jan Graziano
{K:17920} 5/8/2005
|
Mary - taking another look at this I think you are right. I hope I have been able to attach one that has more oomph. If it works - see what you think. Perhaps the frame is just too busy for such a busy bunch of flowers. Jan
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 5/8/2005
|
It's pretty, Janice. But of the 3, this doesn't have the same oomph for some reason. I'm not sure why, so that's no help is it? I like seeing your experiments.
Mary
-
|
|
0 
