|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 12/9/2004
|
Yes, Bertram. They have recently increased the resolution to 1232 x 1848 pixels, and I have the young manageress trained now so that she uses less sharpening and less fierce auto-colour balancing. I do the final tweaking myself. It's a good compromise, because although I might get marginally better scans myself, they take too long for it to be worthwhile...
|
|
|
|
|
The Armed Eye
{K:3563} 12/9/2004
|
Your lab scans fine, nice colours and detail rendering.
|
|
|
|
Paul's Photos
{K:35235} 12/7/2004
|
wow.. where did all these new photos come from.. I thought i just checked your photos haha.. I will have to get a fisheye because I am always attracted to fisheye images.. this photo demonstrates the perfect use for the lens... love how the steps dominate the foreground... excellent work Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Naylor
{K:13064} 12/7/2004
|
wooooh nearly fell down those stairs !!
when I look at this I feel very disorientated, the stairs just 'feel' very strange.
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Lewis
{K:503} 12/7/2004
|
I found myself falling into the picture,
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Thornton
{K:26442} 12/7/2004
|
I'm glad you told me the stairs are not curved because I wa beginning to get some vertigo. I think I like the former one better, just because it has more interest value for me. Maybe the inclusion of a person would add interest for me. Great single-point perspective!
|
|
0 
