|
|
Paul's Photos
{K:35235} 10/29/2004
|
roger, been away for a bit so have a chance to look at your photos.. this one looks so much like one I took in Boston.. nice work, like the lighting and the architecture
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Morris
{K:3307} 10/25/2004
|
This is certainly a well caught image Roger, particularly with a telephone Cam. I particularly like the composition.
I have a panasonic phone here that is extremly low resolution but captures amazingly shat images with well resolved images. I should post a shot here one day too
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 10/25/2004
|
Thank you, Hugo. People are certainly not put off when you pull out a phone and take a picture of them. I can even take in "stealth" mode on the trains... I might make a street photographer yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 10/25/2004
|
Chris, the basic definition claimed is 1024 x 768, the old XGA spec. But the lens doesn't resolve to that level so it's a bit misleading.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 10/22/2004
|
Not the pinnacle of sharpness, Roger, but not a bad shot from a phone!! How many pixels does it record per image?
Best regards, Chris
P.S. I hope you weren't trying to keep up with the guy in front!! ;-))
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 10/22/2004
|
Hi Roger, Amazing result with a mobile phone camera! Very impressive quality.... And I was thinking a mobile phone was most useful for calling people and receiving calls, and if I were to take a picture, I would need a photo camera.... What's next? A Microwave oven that delivers your paper? A chair you can send for shopping? Or a camera that actually can make a phonecall?
I find the quality amazing. Maybe they have evolved so much, that it's about time I'll get myself one too....;)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
0 
