|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 10/25/2004
|
Brad, the only post processing was some sharpening after I resized the image to 800 by 600 for Usefilm. It's 1024 x 768 as shot. The original colour is not bad, but B&W suits this image. I'm rather surprised myself at what this little gadget can do!
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Thornton
{K:26442} 10/25/2004
|
The large overhangs are dramatic. No talking while photographing!
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 10/25/2004
|
Hi Roger, nice perspective and a good level of contrast. I'd like to see some tonal difference between the sky and the roof, but what can you expect from a mobile phone? The quality of it keeps amazing me.
BTW, thanks for your reply, I can see that a phone camera / camera phone can be ideal for candids and street photography. Looking foreward to what you come up with!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
José Vasconcelos Dias
{K:9341} 10/25/2004
|
Great angle and composition. Regards
|
|
|
|
|
The Armed Eye
{K:3563} 10/25/2004
|
It's a great photo , Roger ! You should go there with a decent tool and do it again, with a bit content in the shadows of the lhs of the pic, the rest is perfect !
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Morris
{K:3307} 10/25/2004
|
Hi Roger, did you do an post processing on this shot other than a B&W conversion? It really is pressing the limits of the dynamic range of the camera but it looks like you have managed to get a full tonal range.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 10/25/2004
|
It was Sunday afternoon, Chris, on the way home from Church... It was unusually deserted, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 10/25/2004
|
You summed it up well, Roger!
But with this kind of shot, with such extremes of light, many a compact digital of 2-3 millions pixels would struggle!
Interesting series despite the inevitable drop in quality.
Best regards, Chris
P.S. It looks like a quiet time of day. Early morning, perhaps? On the dog walk?
|
|
0 
