|
|
|
Rose Martin
{K:4696} 10/31/2004
|
Amazing architecture. I love the colors. The sky was in perfect contrast with the colors. Very nice
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 8/30/2004
|
Hi Jan, I really appreciate the time you take to look further back in my portfolio. Thanks! You describe my intention well, it's what I meant with this shot. I do think I've made better shots during my trip to Iran, but I like this one for the exact same reason.
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
Jan Symank
{K:22030} 8/30/2004
|
What a beautiful mosque
You waited fore a very good moment with the man at a good place in this composition
A very well captured scenary
Groet
Jan
|
|
|
|
Maja Gligoric
{K:13528} 5/21/2004
|
Great architecture!
|
|
|
|
|
kita mcintosh
{K:18594} 5/16/2004
|
splendid architecture with stunning colours
|
|
|
|
Emgy Massidda
{K:60358} 5/14/2004
|
Hi Hugo
I'm always very impressed at the beauty of the architecture you reguarly show us through your images. I don't remember having seen this mosque before. If I had, I don't think I would have forgotten it cause it is fascinating. I like this shot a lot particularly for the many interesting details it shows. The colours are vivid and very beautiful. It must have been a gorgeous sunny day. I don't mind the wires (they could be cloned out easily if you wanted) as much as I mind the huge tree on the left covering part of the dome's roundings. However I can imagine that you would have taken this shot from another angle if possible. Finally....I see that there is a bicycle in the shade of the tree on the left. Is it yours, Hugo? I wouldn't be surprised as I do not expect people there to have or use a bike as means of transportation. On the other hand, the presence of a second bicycle under one of the trees on the right, makes me doubt about it. Oh well.....I should stop being so curious!
Great shot, Hugo
Hugs
Emgy
|
|
|
|
|
B:)liana
{K:30945} 5/11/2004
|
wonderful architecture. but dont you think Hugo that you could contrast it a little bit?!?!? or it is me!??!/!
Kiss, BIliana
|
|
|
|
|
Kristina Kohut
{K:49990} 5/11/2004
|
Very tasteful composition and so interesting and beautiful building! Extremely strong light and no over exposures or ugly shadows, very well done!
|
|
|
|
|
Maria Luisa Vial
{K:36017} 5/10/2004
|
Hi Hugo... Welcome back... I missed you...
I like very much the shot!!! Except for the cables which everybody told you about...
I think that as much as you don't like it... you are going to be needing to use photoshop to correct this problems ... :)
Cheers,
Maria
|
|
|
|
Bobby Mun
{K:3709} 5/10/2004
|
Hi Hugo, wonderful shot... Maybe the picture is cropped too tight... if you can zoom out and off center, it will look better. Amazing color just a little bit exposed :>
Thanks for sharing... it is a wonderful structure.
Cheers ! Bobby
|
|
|
|
|
Carlheinz Bayer
{K:14220} 5/9/2004
|
UUPPPSSS! Now I need to defend myself. I didn't remove the power lines; they kind of got lost. I think the desicion to remove them, depends on the additional information you give to a picture. Hugo usually adds a "story" to his pictures. If you want to have a postcard like picture I would remove them. If you mention them as part of the story everything changes. Then they make totally sense and are very welcome IMHO.
Cheers! Carlheinz
|
|
|
|
tom rumland
{K:14874} 5/9/2004
|
hugo, i don't know that you can say one is "better" than the other as they are completely different. i like that you left the wires in the photo. i would like to see where they go and resolve some of the tension. if you can't see the purpose of the wires they become an obstruction.
this attachment is not to show how i would've cropped it but more to show what i would've included. to include these i would've shot it from a sitting position on the far end of the pond looking up. yes, that would've increased the distortion but hey, i really like distortion. ;^) what do you think?
in summary, my preference lies somewhere between your two shots.
take care,
tom
PS - natural colors?? VERY nice! i like them quite a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Cartwright
{K:52046} 5/9/2004
|
Hi!...Hugo: I See Carlheinz Bayer! Has Been Very Adapt in removing the Offending Lines...Well Done!...Otherwise Excellent Original!!!
Best Regards:
Jeff.
Thank you, for your Comments, Hugo!...Jeff!!!
|
|
|
|
John Loreaux
{K:86210} 5/9/2004
|
This is so interesting My friend Hugo!I love to view the many cultures of the world and the Iranian Photos You have taken show a world very few of Us in the U.S. get to see!Nice that You get to Show us!! Thank You for Your kind comments to Me and I agree with You about cropping on 'The Net" Photo! Thanks for Your valued critique! Have a great day Hugo! My best always!! JOHN
|
|
|
|
|
Antonella Nistri
{K:21867} 5/9/2004
|
Hugo,I cannot understand why a couple people are being so impolite to you. The composition and light are perfect,so what's the point? Why such a low rating?
Is it a crime to represent the reality the way it is without flashy effects?
What if the cables are there? They have a purpose!
In my opinion it's a very good reportage/travel photo and thanking you for sharing, I give you 7 and not because I'm trying to flatter you,but because a photographer like you,who has delivered true pieces of art, can afford also to post simpler photos which show real places and real atmospheres.
Please ignore the rudeness,you are GREAT and do not have to prove anything to anyone!
With my greatest appreciation for all of your work, Antonella
|
|
|
|
|
WALT MESK
{K:10691} 5/9/2004
|
very very good.walt.
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Lightner
{K:12684} 5/9/2004
|
Hugo , now this is what you do best , excellent as usual.And again love the lone figure .
Regards Dan
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 5/9/2004
|
I will get a decent scanner.... I will, I will, I will! But give me a break! It is a pitiful excuse for a over exposed photo...;o)
I'll be back on the holga one....
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
Carlheinz Bayer
{K:14220} 5/8/2004
|
Hi Hugo! I was just missing some details in the "overexposed area". To multiply layers AND use the eraser; that's the killer. Try this with "old" dark room technics! LOL
And man, get a scanner!!! ;-)
Comments on my Holgas? Nope!
Cheers! Carlheinz
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 5/8/2004
|
Hi Carlheinz, Same here.... I keep it besides my computer, but need to catch up on my reading. I also use the multiply layer option (on occasion), very nifty feature. I did tweak the levels in the original one a bit, and burned the foreground. It's not so much an overexposed image, but more of a bad scan.
As to the atmosphere, I shifted back and forth between this one and the original one. Today, I'm with the second one again, although I still think this one is a bit more "common" or "standard"
I just wrote a lengthy comment on your first Holga shot, with two URLs in it, but I don't think it posted properly.... Hope it still does, but let me know if it doesn't, and I'll try to retype it.
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
Carlheinz Bayer
{K:14220} 5/8/2004
|
Hey Hugo! Yes I own the book and it's great. I should read more of it ;-) but I'm more the trial and error kind of guy. It's hard to see a difference but I've also copied and multiplied the background layer but just used 10% opacity. I think it would be great to "fix" the overexposed foreground. Yes and I forgot to mention that I like both but tend to the second one. Has IMHO a better atmosphere. Cheers! Carlheinz
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 5/8/2004
|
Hi Carlheinz, That's much better... It's what I did with the original one, too. It struck me as odd that the third vanishing point was already as heavy as this with a 28mm.... Can't wait to see the results of my new 17mm....;o)
Know the book "the Photoshop book for digital photographers" by Kelby? An excellent manual, possibly also very useful for your gig shots.... A bible, so to say...;o)
Don't know if you read my reply to Tom, but it also addresses your first comment; the colours are genuine... Did use a PL filter, though.
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
Carlheinz Bayer
{K:14220} 5/8/2004
|
Hey Hugo! What do you think about that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 5/8/2004
|
Hi Tom, I know... It's centered...;o) And yes, I think you are right, the wires run to the minarets to broadcast the imams call for prayers. I decided to leave them in (and not to clone them out), as they do represent the actual settings.
As to my position, I did try to take this shot from a position a bit more to my right, but then I would run into a problem with the pond, which would either be distracting or reintroduce the centered aspect. Attached is a wider overview (different shot from the same location. I choose this one, as I think the diagonals are a bit stronger in this one, whereas the attached one is a bit unbalanced, I think. A small difference, though. Taken with a 28 mm lens, the distortion by the third vanishing point is still visible (I did correct that in the shot I posted, but the colours are genuine) Wonder what you think; is the attached photo better?
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carlheinz Bayer
{K:14220} 5/8/2004
|
Hey Hugo! Are the colors really real? The blue? WOW! Fine details with a good comp. Lots to see. Like it! Carlheinz
|
|
|
|
Hermen Pen
{K:9168} 5/8/2004
|
Nice peaceful scene, good colours!
Like many other viewers I was struck by the disturbing cables, I wonder why they are not concealed? I don't mean in Photoshop, but in reality :)
|
|
|
|
|
Raamses Ortiz
{K:4408} 5/8/2004
|
Hi Hugo,
I don't know what to say. Is beautiful, the colors and composition. I like very much the man on the photo. He seams like looking up and I like it. Too bad about the cables, I know you couldn't do anything abput them, I have had the same problem too.
Congrats,
Be seeing you...
Raamses.
|
|
|
|
|
Kees and Carolyn
{K:15193} 5/8/2004
|
Beautiful photo! The mosque is incredible with such intricate detail! The whole photo picks up such minute detail. Lovely colors! I like this one alot!
Carolyn
|
|
|
|
|
Gerhard Hoogterp
{K:4863} 5/8/2004
|
Great and sunny photo. I like it how you always put a person somewhere in the photo to give scale to the things.. Well done!
|
|
|
|
Pedro Libório
{K:53861} 5/8/2004
|
impressive architecture!!!
love the colors and the human presence...
very beautiful image!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Regina Rianelli
{K:24147} 5/8/2004
|
Great picture, Hugo! what a beautiful architecture... soo many little details!
Thanks for sharing this precious with us!!!
Veel SUCCCESS!!!
Best regards,
Regina
|
|
|
|
|
tom rumland
{K:14874} 5/8/2004
|
hugo, i don't know about this one. seems a bit centered ;^) i assume the wires coming down from the cupola are connected to loadspeakers used to broadcast prayers, no? i think changing your position to the right and including one of the corners of the building would definitely help. this would show at least one loudspeaker and give the viewer an idea as to what the wires are for.
take care,
tom
|
|
|
|
|
M. Tigrek
{K:2298} 5/8/2004
|
Very nice Hugo,
Well composed with beautiful colors.
I also like a man walking, and other (sitting just entrance)
My best regards.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 5/8/2004
|
Hugo, I normally like to see all three photos in your triptychs before I comment, but by the time I am ready to comment much of what could and should be said has already been said by many, many others. So forgive me if I don't always comment. I do always enjoy, and pause to look and learn. I also value your continued comments on my efforts.
|
|
|
|
|
Getulio Melo
{K:6481} 5/8/2004
|
Amazing colors and beautiful composition, Hugo! Great shot.
|
|
|
|
Roberto Arcari Farinetti
{K:209486} 5/8/2004
|
a nice architecture shot.. nice one.. nice perspective and compo!
roby
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Cotgreave
{K:15892} 5/8/2004
|
wow a great looking building...how old would it be? Well taken Hugo..rog
|
|
|
|
|
Carmem A. Busko
{K:48785} 5/8/2004
|
Hi, Hugo, I missed you!
Perfect picture again.. with human presence to give sense of scale.
Thank you for your recent comments!
Cheers,
Carmem
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Bowden
{K:64141} 5/8/2004
|
Wonderful architecture Hugo and the colours are super
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Thornton
{K:26442} 5/8/2004
|
Well Hugo, I'm back after a little layoff. This gives a lot of detail, making it an excellent travel shot. I like you inclusion of a figure in the foreground. What are those wires draping down from the spire? Maybe leading to ground from a lightning arrestor?
|
|
|
|
|
giuliano antonio colivicchi
{K:153} 5/8/2004
|
Absolutely a banal shot.
A mediocre composition and too oversatured.
|
|
|
|
Saeed Al Shamsi
{K:47735} 5/8/2004
|
This one is an excellent idea that takes us a way from the obvious monuments or museum,life shot,vertical tree beside wonderful decorative "Mosque",life element humen and water,pity those beautiful places left with ugly wires and cables around them,great image,Saeed
|
|
|
|
|
Kam Broumand
{K:-82} 5/8/2004
|
Hi Hugo,
Wonderful shot! Excellent composition. The colors are amazing. I know the difficulty with cables,(as mentioned by Chris) alot of my shots taken in Iran have/had cables hanging around, but then again i guess they are sometimes part of the image.
great work!
Kamyar
|
|
|
|
神 風
{K:10665} 5/8/2004
|
I was really hoping as many many others that II & III would be better!
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 5/8/2004
|
Hi Hugo! Amazing structure and craftsmanship!
I like it all except the cables hanging down from the top ~ I think I'd have cloned them out as they're a little distracting.
Fine shot nonetheless.
Kind regards, Chris
|
|
|
|
Teunis Haveman
{K:53426} 5/8/2004
|
Hallo Hugo
Weer meer tijd zie ik
Wie kan nu zulke schitterende foto,s maken
Hugo natuurlijk.
Wat een kleuren en wat een licht
Hoe krijg je het voorelkaar
Groet Teunis
|
|
0 
