|
|
|
Kaj Nielsen
{K:15279} 10/8/2003
|
EXCELLENT WORK..............regards Kaj Nielsen
|
|
|
|
|
Kai Aust
{K:330} 10/7/2003
|
Thanks for your comments.
@Andrew: I don't know if then moon was on the right side. But on the right side is a big building with lights. Thank you for the theory, but normally I use the camera automatic.
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Lopez-Calvete
{K:2441} 10/7/2003
|
Its a shame that the moon is not part of the frame as it really makes this pic. Unfortunately the shadows on the bridge are the result of a light source camera right and out of frame, which we could asume to be the real moon. Having said that there is evidence of light on the foliage to the right of the shot but the position of the moon would have definately thrown at least a little shadow of the lamp posts.
Also, the shot is a little blurred because the shutter speed is less than the reciprocal length of the lens. Its only a rule of thumb, but its pretty trustworthy. If you are at 100mm, you need a speed of 1/100 or more or you have to use a tripod. Doubtlessly loads of photo theory experts will give me chapter and verse about the effect of apperture etc, but remember that the greater the aperture, the lower the depth of field and the more of the image that is blurred in the first place. Rules are for the assistance of thinkers and the strict adhearance of idiots, but generally this one is worth remembering.
|
|
|
|
Shiv Kumar Surya
{K:17362} 10/7/2003
|
Very beautiful composition. Beautiful scene.
|
|
|
|
|
sami said
{K:712} 10/7/2003
|
nice image great dof.
|
|
|
|
Teunis Haveman
{K:53426} 10/7/2003
|
Kai, excellent, night photo. beautiful lighting
Teunis
|
|
0 
![/\](http://thumbs.imageopolis.com/images/1/0/7/2/1072/274663-Micro.jpg "/\")
