I think the blur is too indistinct to add a particular feel to the shot, it just looks....well, blurred! Plus there is a distinct green cast to the image which I initially thought was down to there being a lot of green in the frame, but it could be down to daylight film used in artificial light. Let us all know what stock you used. If that is the problem a correction filter to alter the colour temp would have helped. You could also sort this out by tweaking the curves in PS. Also the ambient lighting is flat and the subject being in motion doesn't give much help if the aperture was open as far as possible, though its difficult to tell how deep the field is with the blur.
The framing is basically ok but its a little tight and makes the subjet looked cramped, either get right in there and show us whats important or pull back more and give us more of the picture.
Theres plenty to work with here and please don't think I'm just flaming you or anything, feedback is what makes this forum so valuable and I'd rather have a frank opinion on one of my shots than the usual "hey, cool pic". If I've missed the point and there is a story behind the shot then post a reply or add to the info section on the shot. I did this the other day at the photographers gallery which was exhibiting a series of mostly out of focus shots of a market, I only realised at the end that the whole project was shot on a camera purchased at the market the week before for 50p and the snapper was a serious pro with credits in Nat Geo, Elle, Vogue, etc.......doh! Glad I didn't voice my disdain more loudly!
0 
