|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/10/2008
|
OK, now I got you!
Thanks a lot for the patience!
Nick
|
|
|
aZiZ aBc
{K:28345} 12/9/2008
|
Absolutely !
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/8/2008
|
No matter how old the story is, it has to be understaood even if I would be searching for ever, Aziz.
I think you mean that the stone itself (the real object) had the good texture, ey? Some of it was retained of course on the image too, but it could be better, I guess.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
aZiZ aBc
{K:28345} 12/3/2008
|
Hi Nick, Again a linguistic problem ! First of all you are pulling out a dead body from its tomb! I mean it's an old story ! I meant " although the sharpness is not enough, still it has a good texture !", and by good texture I meant the shape and colors of different parts ! in a whole composition. Aziz ( from Seoul airport )
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/3/2008
|
Ok, thanks a lot, Saad! Now I understand you!
Well, I don't retouch photos. What I post is what I shot. Directly. No editings, no balast, no overload, only camera and lens. It is unimagibale how much one can do without using any additional things at all.
So, what exactly made you think that I retouched it?
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/3/2008
|
Oops, now you puzzle me, Aziz! How can the texture be good when the clarity and sharpness are inadequate? I guess rather that the texture is not good this way.
Ir did I misunderstand something?
Cheers and thanks a lot!
Nick
|
|
|
Saad Salem
{K:89003} 10/16/2008
|
no dear,I mean you retouched the shot ,that is what I have noticed in the photo,regards, Saad.
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 10/16/2008
|
Hi Saad!
You mean, you found a way to better it by retouching? If so, would you please attach it? I am greteful for any help I can get for this one!
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
aZiZ aBc
{K:28345} 10/16/2008
|
Good texture, inadequate clarity and sharpness ! H&H Aziz
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 10/16/2008
|
Thanks a lot Indranil! I need any help I can get with this one.
The POV you say. OK, let me try some other possibilities for putting some more interest on it.
And it may as well be indeed a bit blured. The thing is that I can't say if it is camera shake or clipping (overburn) of the highlights. I notice that this seems to be stronger on the white part and so my mind goes automatically to clipping, but is it this way or do my eyes play tricks to me?
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
Saad Salem
{K:89003} 10/15/2008
|
Hi Nick,I could see an editing around the shot, in favor one,which changed the textures of the shot from area to an other ,adding to the shot,my regards, Saad.
|
|
|
Indranil Ray
{K:2035} 10/15/2008
|
Nice observation. I like the texture also. IMHO POV is not so attractive overhere, you can experiment a bit. Looks little blured.
|
|