|
|
|
Henry Liu
{K:33} 12/12/2006
|
Hey Marc,
I'm feeling honoured to get a comment from my idol. Thank you very much!
As for the gold-n-blue filter, yes, you are right. I bought this filter due to a recommend from a film-shooter friend, and immediately realized that the polarized effect was way too exegerated on digital sensors and you could not see the real effect from viewfinder, only later realized 99% of shots not acceptable. (I have shot with this filter less than 20 images so far), considerting get rid of it.
Thank you and everyone else who contributed comments here.
Henry
|
|
|
|
Marc Adamus
{K:805} 12/12/2006
|
Why use a gold-n-blue filter shooting digital? No reason to do this, as it's much more easily and accurately done in RAW processing. Of course you still need filters, but you can chuck the color filters, warmers and enhancers. The result you achieved here is two clicks away by increasing color temperature and adjusting tint to taste. I would suspect you used a GND filter also, or double processed the RAW file. Either way it worked well to control the dynamic range. The tonal balance is perfectly natural and highlight control is excellent. The light on the stone kearns is a huge asset. I do think the blue in the pool of water is too pronoucned due to the filter use. It's not exactly reflecting the hues in the sky so it jumps out at me. I do like the composition very much, just a few things to think about.
|
|
|
|
|
Rodrigo Cunha
{K:2276} 12/12/2006
|
I really like the results you achieved with this filter.
Well done,
Rod
|
|
|
|
Andrzej Pradzynski
{K:22541} 12/12/2006
|
Interesting effect from the filter, but great scene and lights at first place. Cheers, NJ
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 12/12/2006
|
Excelentes luces y colores.
Felicitaciones!
|
|
|
|
p e t a .
{K:18700} 12/12/2006
|
Love it! You should post larger Henry.
|
|
0 
