Photograph By Wolf Zorrito
Wolf Z.
Photograph By charlie f. kohn
charlie f. k.
Photograph By txules                                .
txules  .
Photograph By Jill Bartlett
Jill B.
Photograph By Jill Bartlett
Jill B.
Photograph By Gene Zonis
Gene Z.
Photograph By davide lupo-pasini
davide l.
Photograph By Marc Fontannaz
Marc F.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 

 
User Activity
Image Summary
Awards Received
Portfolio Summary
Critiques from Don
Critiques to Don

Portfolios

Categories
Abstracts (1)
Architecture (3)
Digital (1)
From The Field (3)
Landscape (2)
Travel (1)


Critiques To 


  1


Critique By: Anthony Lound  (K:6661) Donor  
7/3/2009 3:14:32 AM

What's astonishing about this image, the sheer quality of it, is the fact you grabbed it from HD video. It seems were are moving fast towards another dimension of how images are taken and presented. The possibilities are amazing!

Best regards Don,

Anthony
        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)

Critique By: Anthony Lound  (K:6661) Donor  
10/6/2005 2:37:53 AM

Hallo Don. How do you define "fake"? By what criteria? It's all subjective I reckon. Here's something I posted earlier about this stuff:

"I've said before elsewhere that the Nikon D70's images straight off cam (RAW) always look flat and underexposed, by design (to permit a wider range of post-processing correction). For ME at least, I tend sometimes to over-react to this off-cam insipidness in PS, and as I said earlier, I'm often too fond of "pop" in an image.

Having said all that, this image was taken in late September and there was rather more of a burnished, golden tone overall, which I clearly overdid in this image. With magenta removed however, it looks like lush May to me, so for this particular subject I think a point midway might be more "accurate". BUT this raises a question I put to our mutual friend Kathy Hillier the other day: where is the boundary between "photoart" and purely "documentary photography"? IS there one?

For instance, some folk on here replace entire skies, imported from libraries presumably labelled "dramatic skyscapes", and yet they do not describe their pics as "photoart". They seem to have no problem with this, including many award winners. Are these people merely painting with light? What is the photographer communicating to us? Could it be construed as "dishonest", and if so, against what criteria? Does it matter whether a sky has been added, that colours don't look "natural" or "accurate"? I do not know. I must admit though that unless an image is qualified on here as "photoart" or "alternative process" I broadly agree with you that "documentary photography" - images of record if you will - should receive minimal PS "treatment". Whether cloning out power lines for example, or other subjectively objectionable elements in a capture amounts to "photoart" I am not sure, and I return to the issue of boundaries and definitions".

Kindest Regards,

Anthony
        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)

Critique By: Don mecano  (K:141)  
10/5/2005 6:12:44 PM

Anthony,
I can see what you mean, however, too much saturation may sometimes give it a "fake" look. What do you think?
Thank you for your comments and your example.
        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)

Critique By: Don mecano  (K:141)  
10/5/2005 6:09:55 PM

Thanks for your comments, I look forward looking through some of yours.
        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)

Critique By: Anthony Lound  (K:6661) Donor  
10/5/2005 3:44:34 AM

wha?
        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)

Critique By: Anthony Lound  (K:6661) Donor  
10/5/2005 3:39:50 AM

Hmm, I do not know why my take on your image didn't upload..trying again:
        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)

Critique By: Anthony Lound  (K:6661) Donor  
10/5/2005 3:38:02 AM

This is a "painterly" image in my opinion, of great quality Don. Just a subjective tweak on an otherwise slightly flat tone (in the context of an image like this, and bearing in mind the time of year in which it was taken):
        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)

Critique By: Claude Lussier  (K:4626)  
10/5/2005 2:55:22 AM

Very nice picture, love the composition in nice tone and colors, good work, well done Don.
        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)

Critique By: Maureen Austin  (K:273)  
10/4/2005 7:35:15 AM

Excellent Don

The colours are beautifully mixed,an awesome capture.

        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)

Critique By: Anthony Lound  (K:6661) Donor  
10/4/2005 1:04:10 AM

Don, I love the warm light and rustic feeling your image evokes. In altogether appealing composition. I'm surprised you haven't had more comments on this lovely photo. Keep up you good work; it's very accomplished so early in your career
        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)

Critique By: Anthony Lound  (K:6661) Donor  
10/2/2005 3:34:17 AM

WOW, that is an image and a half Don! - it looks almost impressionist - shadows and subtle colours make this a wonderful entance to Usefilm. Welcome and very well done!

Anthony
        Photo By: Don mecano  (K:141)


  1


|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.2021484