|
|
fokstrot .
{K:6560} 11/29/2008
|
Love it!
|
|
|
|
|
James Hager
{K:6285} 6/8/2005
|
Thanks for the additional info Phil. I've never had any trouble with color saturation or exposure with my Canon TC.
|
|
|
|
|
James Hager
{K:6285} 6/8/2005
|
Thanks Darlene. You're not bad with the birds either. :)
|
|
|
|
|
Darlene Boucher
{K:15739} 6/7/2005
|
He was checking you out........beautiful, you do this sooooo well!
|
|
|
|
|
Phil Monger
{K:296} 6/7/2005
|
I think it was the border throwing my eye off. When I took it out in PS it looked a lot better.
I say that about TC's because in my experience they often leave you with unsaturated and underexposed shots unless you compensate for it.
Nice work.
|
|
|
|
|
Lee Harris
{K:14694} 6/7/2005
|
excellent !
|
|
|
|
|
Luigi Parisi
{K:1167} 6/7/2005
|
Fantastic wildlife shot, perfect composition and cut. Great technical.
Congrats.
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret Sturgess
{K:49403} 6/7/2005
|
Thanks James it is gorgeous - you can count them :). It really shows how fabulous the image is to have such a close crop and still be so sharp/detailed and lovely Margaret
|
|
|
|
|
James Hager
{K:6285} 6/7/2005
|
Thanks Margaret. I love the eyelashes too. I've attached a 1:1 crop of her left eye from the original so you can start counting. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Hager
{K:6285} 6/7/2005
|
Thanks for your comment Phil. The colors might look week because it was an overcast, dull day, and I didn't punch it up to make it look fake. Why do you say it looks underexposed? I doubt the TC effected anything you commented on. It does make the images just a tad softer, but nothing you'd notice at the resolution I post at here.
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret Sturgess
{K:49403} 6/7/2005
|
James What fabulous detail and colours. I would die for those eyelashes :) you can almost count them. His coat looks so silky and his ears so velvety he/she is beautiful and your composition is perfect in every way 7++++++++++++
Margaret
|
|
|
|
|
Phil Monger
{K:296} 6/7/2005
|
Very well framed, but can't help thinking the colours are slightly weak - and looks a little under exposed (a very little).
Perhaps the teleconverter is to blame?
|
|
|
|
Mike Middendorffi
{K:371} 6/7/2005
|
Very well done. . .always a happy catch with perfect DOF and a few sharp but subdued details in the foreground with your subject.
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Svensson
{K:4} 6/7/2005
|
Really nice and super sharp
|
|
|
|
|
Carolyn Wiesbrock
{K:14051} 6/7/2005
|
Perfect timeing, you caught him at just the right moment he looked at your camera
Superb!
|
|
0 
