|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 2/6/2005
|
ok now THAT is cool....thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
M *
{K:2614} 2/6/2005
|
love the series they are great and emotional images cool stuff i'd hang them on my wall.
|
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/27/2005
|
Thanks very much for commenting Greg...so glad you like my brain.
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory J. Mclemore
{K:166} 1/27/2005
|
Superb .
Love the attitude.
I like your choice of black and white.
All of your shots have a different perspective.
I could rate all of your shots but I have to run.
You should blow your shots up. They are striking images.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/24/2005
|
it's ok mister.
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Laszlo
{K:2086} 1/24/2005
|
Sorry :-(
|
|
|
|
|
E H
{K:1665} 1/23/2005
|
Erin, in all honesty: forget this NR software. You could do much better NR in Photoshop. Steeper learning curve maybe, but far more convincing results.
|
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/23/2005
|
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
Marcio Janousek
{K:32538} 1/23/2005
|
Fantastic shot !
Perfect work with teddy ..
nice capturing
|
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/22/2005
|
ehehehe....
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Drago
{K:10902} 1/22/2005
|
I've always loved your jaw line. even before I knew you existed. I tried this shot with myself; my kid has boots like that & I can just get them on. lacks something though.
|
|
|
|
Bryan Steffy
{K:4910} 1/22/2005
|
grain/artifacts/noise, whatever ya call it... i think i like it with better with out it.... just my opinion, not to get off the subject, i love the image it is dramatic and beautiful a great deal of emotion... i especially like the pose it is wonderfully done audra wonderfull...
b
|
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/22/2005
|
They took up allotta space didn't they..?
piss match..right under my image..dang it.
|
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/22/2005
|
Thank you Robbie..nice words..Yes this is a neatimage result...I am just stoked at the new prospect of "noise" ..heh..free work.
|
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/22/2005
|
WOW!! thank you Anne!!
|
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/22/2005
|
No fighting allowed under my image..dammit
:0/
|
|
|
|
|
Rona K **
{K:2375} 1/22/2005
|
Either way its great and they all need to shut up about the Grain. lol...
|
|
|
|
J Dillon
{K:1426} 1/22/2005
|
audra.. i love your look and your style. you would be a fantastic model to shoot, as well. i always look forward to seeing your next image. is this a neatimage result? it really is much more refined than its predecessor. very nice work :)
|
|
|
|
Mark Julian
{K:36866} 1/22/2005
|
Well Stephen, since you put it THAT WAY...what was that..."professional and masterful"... I have no choice but to completely agree with you. So carry on ...I kinda can see your point now much more clearly......(i'll recant the "tap taps")...not another peep out of me....
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Laszlo
{K:2086} 1/22/2005
|
LOL, thank you Mark, but using the word "grain" is important. I'm sorry, but it is a term that should be used correctly. And I'm very surprised you'd downplay the importance of film terminology, especially grain, when you're portfolio is so professional and masterful.
|
|
|
|
RC. Dany
{K:64104} 1/22/2005
|
FANTASTIC IMAGE !!!!
FANTASTIC WORK.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Julian
{K:36866} 1/22/2005
|
First of all, Digital isn't even true photography (if you look up Photography in the dictionary) so who cares what word is used. Dude, don't be so anal.......GRAIN, GRAIN, GRAIN, GRAIN, (to infinity) I win tap tap - no changes - 2005 (now let's all go play in the sandbox) She - it !!!
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Laszlo
{K:2086} 1/22/2005
|
Carla, I've already commented on Audra's outstanding portfolio on plenteous occasions ? this humdrum discussion regarding grain has nothing to do intellect or ignorance.
|
|
|
|
|
Carla Stephens
{K:3148} 1/22/2005
|
Stephen, perhaps you should find another website and surround yourself with photographers who are more intellectual, such as yourself. You still have not been kind enough to comment on this photo.
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Laszlo
{K:2086} 1/22/2005
|
Oh, please... grain is not a digital term and never was... get an education.
|
|
|
|
|
Carla Stephens
{K:3148} 1/22/2005
|
Stephen, don't let it bother you so much, we see grain. Photoshop uses the term grain under their filters and not digital artifacts, perhaps you should start there:) Hope you enjoyed Audra's work, you never mentioned.
Carla
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Laszlo
{K:2086} 1/22/2005
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/22/2005
|
" digital noise "...sorry mister..better..?
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Laszlo
{K:2086} 1/22/2005
|
Can you all please stop using the word "grain" when what you're seeing is digital artifacts!
|
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/22/2005
|
Thanks Carla...Yeah..I agree sometimes grain is cool..but I don't like not having a choice in the matter..some stuff..I don't want grainy.
I had NO idea I could remedy grain..ha ha !!
can you tell I'm geeked..?
|
|
|
|
|
Carla Stephens
{K:3148} 1/22/2005
|
New repost looks great, although there are some very nice shots out there with intended grain. In any event, well done.
Carla
|
|
0 
