|
|
Liz Wallis
{K:26133} 6/3/2005
|
yep into my favs, Liz
|
|
|
|
|
Dorothy Di Liddo
{K:13787} 1/5/2005
|
ok, so I love this... it's in my favs!!!!! What's your secret for getting your film pics to look so good on the computer, do you have a disc made as well, or just a really good scanner? Dottie
|
|
|
|
audra erin
{K:3837} 1/5/2005
|
Into my favs you go.
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Heath
{K:4559} 1/5/2005
|
g'day Jim, nice IR series, very clever and enterprising use of equipment and materials, I guess you have found that IR film tends to give large areas of blown highlights, my experience is that the film can record an amazing amount of information that can be extracted by what seems to be gross exposure times when printing
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Lloyd
{K:9943} 1/4/2005
|
yes lovely house wen can i move in lol nice pic
|
|
|
|
|
Rebecca Raybon
{K:26654} 1/4/2005
|
Very nice! Excellent composition!
|
|
|
|
Howie Mudge
{K:27933} 1/4/2005
|
I like the composition here Jim and the IR effect. Some of the building is just a little on the hot side but its still a very effective capture :)
|
|
|
|
Mark Mahar
{K:3233} 1/4/2005
|
Guess you're tired of adding the details of the shot! Looks great! The effect is very retro. The church on the left throws some added interest to the scene as well as the car and dirt driveway...looks like a Pontiac GTO, though I could be wrong. Excellent composition. 7 all the way. -mm
|
|
0 
