|
|
|
xy x
{K:41915} 9/23/2003
|
Lovely construction with good blue colours and with a little more contrast could be a one nice work, keep traying.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave M
{K:9043} 9/14/2003
|
Bryce, you certainly have managed to capture the majesty here. I might have even walked closer to the building for more magnitude. A polarizer would have helped with the sky -- it's always a difficult balance with exposure. Well done.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Lauritzen
{K:14949} 9/10/2003
|
Bryce,
This is shot on color film right? Then a red filter would have done nothing for this. A polarizer and a warming filter as Sue mention would work. This kind of shot dosent work well in color(my opinion) and shot be shot in B&W. More sky detail is needed so shooting this on a partly cloudy day would work well.
Shoot this on B&W film with a Red #25 filter on a partly cloudy day and you would have a very good shot.
|
|
|
|
Sue O'S
{K:12878} 9/10/2003
|
A moose filter would have done well to polarize the sky yet warm up the scene.
Interesting perspective. Nice historic building.
|
|
|
|
|
Bryce Stammerjohan
{K:32} 9/10/2003
|
HI Rob! No it is most assuredly the original Flat Iron in Manhattan, but I agree that there is more than a passing resemblence to the Renoir. I probably have some decent pics of the Renoir, too (I live in SF)! Thanks for your comment. - bryce
|
|
|
|
Rob Holschbach
{K:2748} 9/10/2003
|
Looks like the Renoir Hotel in SF?
|
|
0 
