|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 8/28/2008
|
Thanks a lot again Gustavo!
But... technically correct? Take a look again.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 8/26/2008
|
The intervention has been there. There is no such light-cliping in reality, and thus I changed something already. I intervened, Yazeed.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 8/26/2008
|
Yes, of course! And then also a lobotomy, ey? ;-)
Thanks heavens *that* woman will still *say* what she thinks about what I do directly and sincerely instead of taking the sweeeeet smile of the charming little angle that behaves like a "girlie". That's why I listen to her.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 8/26/2008
|
De la serie, esta es la que más me gusta, técnicamente correcta y de gran belleza. Me gusta la luz suave.
Un abrazo!
|
|
|
|
M jalili
{K:69009} 8/25/2008
|
There is a picture of the landscape integrated at all without any intervention by the reform .
Regards ............
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 8/25/2008
|
I know, Yazeed! And I am indeed glad if you find the image good. The problem with the overexposed flowers is something else than taste and liking, however. It's about a technical problem that is good to be mentioned for knowing a bit more about such things too. And so I think, if that overexposure wasn't there, the image would retain the same general atmosphere for liking it, but it would also have one problem less. (I am not sure about that, I only think so.)
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
Wolf Zorrito
{K:78768} 8/25/2008
|
You need a woman, SHE will tell you what you do wrong hahahahahahahaha ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
M jalili
{K:69009} 8/24/2008
|
Each has his sense of tasting and private sectors. In fact I did not read any comment before I write any comment.
Therefore not affected, including books on any action. I described what I find beautiful in any sense, which has caused me from the inside.
Respect and appreciation for other views .
Yours Yazeed .........
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 8/24/2008
|
Exactly Reyhan! The intense overexposure destroyed their details completely, as Harry already said. So I am glad to see that most looks seem to agree about that.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 8/24/2008
|
Thanks a lot Yazeed!
As Harry pointed out, however, the lighting was too strong and so we have washed out flowers here.
Anyway...
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 8/24/2008
|
Yep! Exactly, Harry! It is indeed that "clip" which introduces the loss of details that would be present otherwise. Light metering wasn't sufficient for avoiding that. I used the centerweighted average metering mode of the T70 but the selective area metering mode would fit much better here, if I had placed the selective area, say 2/3 on the darker background and 1/3 on the highlight of one of the flowers - and also vice versa. Which results into what you say about EV.
Thanks a lot for yet another reasonable point! I must wonder why only just a few guys will talk about such things in a (so called?) photography forum, but thanks heavens there are still some few guys around that will do.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 8/24/2008
|
Whenever you do, Aziz!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
reyhan yaz
{K:1171} 8/23/2008
|
quailty but flowers not clear...
|
|
|
|
|
M jalili
{K:69009} 8/23/2008
|
I like it so much my friend .
Regards .........
|
|
|
|
|
Wolf Zorrito
{K:78768} 8/23/2008
|
No, overexposure made the light clip so you lost detail.
Always try to shoot on EV-1 or EV-2 so in daylight. In PS you can always compensate that with a better result.
|
|
|
|
aZiZ aBc
{K:28345} 8/23/2008
|
I will comment later !
|
|
0 
