|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 3/10/2008
|
Nonetheless, I thank you very much, Andre! I asked already many forums but still I don't have any dynamics-monster film. But I continue and surely there must be somebody that used such a film around.
Oh, and not to forget! Good returning to the darkroom some day! ;-)
Nick
|
|
|
|
Andre Denis
{K:66327} 3/8/2008
|
Hi Nick,
Sorry I can't help you with your search for films with extreme dynamics range. I have been completely out of the loop in regards to film for quite some time now since going digital. I know I will get back into it for sure. I miss the darkroom work. But not too much yet. :)
I'm sure there must be some photography forums on the web somewhere that can answer your questions on film.
Andre
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 3/7/2008
|
Yes, and I think too that it could generate an image that is almost impossible to get with a single shot, Andre. Linda referred to this possibility too, and so I start planing some similar shots in order to first see what and how this can be accomplished, and much more in order to also see where the dynamics range comes to its limits.
BTW, I also search for some film with an extreme dynamicsd range. So, do you perhaps know of some exotic film that has this property?
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Andre Denis
{K:66327} 3/6/2008
|
Hi Nick,
It is a real challenge to get it all correctly exposed in this case. If you go with correct exposure on the flowers, most likely the rest of the image will suffer.
There is something that you can do just for a fun exercise. If you had a tripod set up you could take a few differnt exposures and then try cutting and blending them together in Photoshop. Cheating, I suppose, but it would be interesting to try.
Andre
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 3/5/2008
|
Thanks a lot for the nice and detailed comment, Andre!
The thing here is, I' afraid, I once again wanted too much ;-) The whole scene was my subject, and of course the flowers as a part of the scene too.
The light is indeed to strong there. I assume now that a bit of underexposure wouldn't remove many details, and so perhaps it would have been a help for that.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 3/5/2008
|
Thanks a lot for the nice comment, Dave! Yes, that kind of shadow/light game produced by natural sunlight that comes into the room from the window can be quite appealing!
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 3/5/2008
|
Hmm, I find it quite complicated and with a problem of overexposure at the orchids, Gustavo. But thanks a lot for your nice comment! Perhaps that overexposure is at the end not very important.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 3/5/2008
|
And excellent thanks, Ugo!
Nick
|
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:150877} 3/5/2008
|
I like the lighting you have used here, Nick! Natural window light has always appealed to me, and here it is very suggestive of the inside houseplant environment of the windowsill. I like your composition along these lines, too.
Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
Andre Denis
{K:66327} 3/4/2008
|
Hi Nick,
I suppose it all comes down to what the main subject is.
You do have wonderful light and detail in most of the room. The vases, both curtains, the whole left side of the image and the right side curtain, all look great. But if the purpose was to feature the orchids, I'm afraid the light may have been too strong in that area.
Andre
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 3/4/2008
|
Muy bonita! simple pero muy agradable!
Felicitaciones!
|
|
|
|
Ugo Rimoldi
{K:6232} 3/4/2008
|
Excellent image!!!!!
|
|
0 
