|
|
Annemette Rosenborg Eriksen
{K:55244} 10/19/2007
|
Dear Visar
I´m sorry for being so late these days but I have lots of my mind with exhibition/competition, galleryexhibition/sale and more.
Thanks for your great encouragement and for making me do this series:-)
Yes, sometimes we do get to think further when having it put in another context - normality and the narrow way we look upon all that surrounds us is changed and offers us a new meaning.
Take care down there and talk to you later, Greeneye:-)
|
|
|
|
|
Annemette Rosenborg Eriksen
{K:55244} 10/15/2007
|
Dear Luis
Yes, a work of an artist is brought forward by the soul always leaving a trace of the artist her/himself.
Although sharing some codes, I´m certain that people make up their own depending on themselves, their inner world, experiences and their culture.
That is what makes art wonderful because it brings forth so many interpretations even when being titled.
Thanks for your interest and thoughts.
Warm hugs
Annemette
|
|
|
|
absynthius .
{K:20748} 10/15/2007
|
Yes, some are withdrown, like a wall, but conscious with bright spooky eyes open!
Annemette, you are...!! great fine art/ist. Using so well symbols, elemets that bring up illustration of the idea in a very selective manner. Like bringing forth the your understanding of the world and it's complexity. You are creating something unique, and i am beginning to envy you, :P, for the great effort on the Some Are topic.
I encourage you to keep up, just keep up... I think you'll succeed to even explain many things around that till now you did not have time to think about, or understand... I really hate those that i sometime think of many things around them as sensless! There is no such thing as sensless, there is only lazyness to understanding and combine things and make meaning, or better say explain that understanding of yours about a certain thing that you have chosen to focus your attention.
best regards,
V.
|
|
|
|
Luis Steinberg (EFIAP)
{K:21250} 10/15/2007
|
An artist do some work, like this an others...Why they do them, for him or for her or for the people for the world. In the first instance for you...(in this case for her), but at the end when the art it's showed to the people is not more form the artist is from all...By all that reassons your photos -really fine art- by the message and the idea are of all of us...The distance and the language are not a problems, when we can exchange criterias.- Of course the image is different of the words...do you belive in a universal semiotic code? Or you think that each one whom see the photo make the own code...? Much questions, much words, at the end affectionate .- LUIS:)
|
|
|
|
Roger Skinner
{K:81846} 10/14/2007
|
umm not as succesful as your previous manipulation
|
|
|
|
|
Annemette Rosenborg Eriksen
{K:55244} 10/14/2007
|
I made this as an opposite to being open and expressive- here inverted almost, withdrawn. It´s myself with eyes that I´ve brightend to make spooky;-)
|
|
|
|
Shirley D. Cross-Taylor
{K:174049} 10/14/2007
|
Scary as heck, but fascinating art, dear Annemette!;) 
|
|
|
|
luis pereira
{K:26013} 10/14/2007
|
Great work. I'm not sure what I'm looking at but it doesn't really matter
|
|
0 
