|
|
|
Mary Slade
{K:40338} 10/21/2006
|
Great idea and angle. And to see the textures and colours in the movement.
|
|
|
|
Juan Gonzalo Marcano Prieto
{K:14254} 10/21/2006
|
muy buena toma, me gusta como quedo el movimiento de la arena, excelente
|
|
|
|
Jose Ignacio (Nacho) Garcia Barcia
{K:96391} 10/21/2006
|
great.very cool.
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 10/20/2006
|
Oh no! What did I do? Thanks heavens photoshop allows a very quick and painless reconnection, so I return your other foot to you! ;-)
I still don't know exactly which of the two is stronger, but considering the upper part and especially the foot with the flying sand around it, I think of making a stand rather than of going. It looks like setting a mark that declares with all clarity: "Here I stand, that's me!"
That's of course only an impression that is generated by observing the photo alone. Going is indeed not very good for clear photos, but perhaps an even shorter exposure time? (Only an idea.)
Best wishes, and a good reconnection! ;-)
Nick
|
The return of the missing foot |
|
|
|
Annemette Rosenborg Eriksen
{K:55244} 10/20/2006
|
Oh no! I´m limping forever having my one foot cut off! But I see that having only one foot, at least in the photo can make it stronger.
You´re also right about the missing clarity, but that´s difficult when moving and taking photos at the same time:-)
Best wishes,
Annemette
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 10/20/2006
|
With or without the foot at the bottom? That's the question here! I cropped it but still I can't decide.
Anyway, a nice capture of a moment. I only think that the flying sand needed a bit more sharpness for being more visible on its flight.
Keep it up,
Nick
|
Foot off |
|
0 
