I posted this to get feedback, the same as the rest of what I posted. In hindsight there are some shots which aren't that good. On this shot there are three marks that I can see which I didn't look for beforehand, and that's my own failing and can be held against me. The composition is vague, it's neither halves nor thirds in a way that doesn't add to the shot. I disagree with you about the exposure, it's more about the sky colour than anything else, although there was some foreground detail on my screen at home fading into a black horizon. You are right though, that alone isn't enough to carry the shot. That's my point of view.
I fail to see why you posted this. The exposure is all wrong with no detail in the foreground. Neither is it an interesting composition. And it has dust marks! You should be more discriminating in what you put up and not post images regardless of their merit.
0 
