|
|
|
selami Torun
{K:9397} 5/13/2006
|
very interesting image and very good composition!! wonderful details and contras...
Congratulations!
Best regards
|
|
|
|
Fatemeh Rahimi
{K:13523} 5/13/2006
|
nice angle and lovely title. the tone shows its oldness perfectly!
bravo Annemette!
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Slade
{K:40338} 5/12/2006
|
Great idea Annemette- sad that it will be entirely gone one day. The angle you get is brilliant and the colours really stress it is near the end.
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 5/12/2006
|
Another one of those simple but suggestive photos with an incredibly dense atmosphere.
Almost unreachable those half circle things - and what are they? And is the tree still living and just waiting for the spring? Or is it dying? Questions over questions.
One can really imagine how tall it should have been back in time, judging from the perspectivic contours of its surface, as they get higher and higher. But then, the sudden cut of those lines comes, and something is really missing - something that one can assume and feel. It just have to have been there. And the next question comes: Why isn't it there any more? And the title answers.
A great kind of abstract/nature combination, Annemette!
Keep it up!
Nick
|
|
|
|
João F * Photography
{K:41945} 5/11/2006
|
Intersting shot dear Annemette !!
jo
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 5/11/2006
|
Nicely done . . . the white/washed out sky seems the perfect backdrop for this once terrestrial giant. It evokes an image of by-gone stature and superiority.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
0 
