|
|
|
Knut Hoftun Knudsen
{K:526} 5/4/2003
|
Great shot
|
|
|
|
|
John Charlton
{K:5595} 3/8/2003
|
I really, and I mean really, really like everything below the lower limit of the top branch. Everything above that point does nothing to improve the image for me. Without the top, I would give this image an 11 out of ten. With it, I am inclined to give it an eight.
|
|
|
|
Eric Goldwasser
{K:4294} 3/8/2003
|
I like this very much! Without the tree, this would be an average sunset photo. The tree limbs add so much!
|
|
|
|
|
Marco Grandi
{K:16680} 3/5/2003
|
Splendid sunset!Nice silhouettes,colors and reflection.Well done.
Bye Marco.
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Barrette
{K:21125} 3/5/2003
|
Bulent, evet !
This is remarkable. I'm fascinated bythe reflections in the sky over the sun. It looks a bit like a spaceship ! I agree that the lower branch is very strong compositionnally, and a bit distracting.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Naylor
{K:13064} 3/5/2003
|
Just the sort of shot which I love. Stick to the rule of thirds well, not exactly sure about the lower branch. I can't decide whether the shot would look better without it.
Well done
|
|
|
|
|
Ricky Hirshfield
{K:832} 3/5/2003
|
Bulent. This shot is framed well and the tree is well focused, nothing worse then a blurred silhouette in a shot like this. I like the frame around the sun and the two waves rolling in at the bottom, they add movement to the image. Nice photo.
Ricky
|
|
0 
