|
|
Phil M
{K:11526} 3/16/2006
|
I'll just have to post some of my other shots from here to see what you think! I could never contemplate reversing a landscape (or probably any other) image though; which is a whole debate in itself!...
|
|
|
|
Jim Greenfield
{K:5172} 3/16/2006
|
again with some contrast adjustment. it brought more out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Greenfield
{K:5172} 3/16/2006
|
i did a crop to show that there are compositions inside other compositions. i flipped it too since the brain responds better to heaviness or height on the left of an image.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Greenfield
{K:5172} 3/16/2006
|
and the stitch software worked flawlessly
|
|
|
|
|
Phil M
{K:11526} 3/16/2006
|
Yeah - I guess what is really needed to get a decent panorama here is to get down on the shore and have some foreground interest with rocks etc. I was supposed to be working when I took this though, so will have to return in my free time! I did take some other more close-up shots including buildings etc in the foreground, which are probably more pleasing as images; I might post some at some point. Just felt like playing with the stitching software tonight!...
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Greenfield
{K:5172} 3/16/2006
|
that is an improvement. i think being closer would have been better period. Do YOU think it looks better? Do you understand my point?
|
|
|
|
|
Phil M
{K:11526} 3/16/2006
|
Do you think it would still look balanced if the foreground were cropped? E.g. like this... or did you have something more extreme in mind?
|
cropped version |
|
|
|
|
Jim Greenfield
{K:5172} 3/16/2006
|
the mountains are the pretty portion of this image. The dried out foreground does nothing for this image. There is too much of it.
|
|
0 
