It is such an unanswerable question in regarding to the comparative term of today's technology compared to what we'd used in the past. I draw up the words of one of the most remarkable landscape photographer, Ansel Adams who'd devoted himself in landscape photographic art creations. From this photo, it might be littel help theoretically but, could it be a final answer? No one know! Any way there might be another question of why I choose AD. because he is so remarkable or he was such a highly experienced photographer?, the answer is No, and I don't even know exactly why he is so remarkable as many of his works are desirable for many collectors. But there is one more private question I've tried to find about this photographer after receiving one interesting information over his master piece as one of his works can cost up to US$200mn. why? because his work is so good (so interested, so beautiful, so wow...)if it so, all photographers via usefilm or else are so rich now because we're also, have been creating good works as well. If not we wouldn't even wasting time download the photo to show to everyone here or elsewhere. so why US$200mn why him... why not us.. Highly opened for sharing the idea Best regards, PC
0 
