Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 or Canon 17-40mm f/4 L USM

Greg S.	parehan ..	Robert G.	Ayan M.	Bea F.	Ayan M.	Jason M.	Gene Z.

	Sign Up Now! \| Log In \| Help
	Your photo sharing community!

	Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography! Upload your photos. Award recipients are chosen daily.
Click above to buy imageopolis art for your home or office.	Read About Awards, Featured Critiques and Comments - Click HERE
Check Out Today's Uploads - Click HERE Check Out Timeless Photos From The Past - Click HERE

Share On

Photography Forum: Nature Photography Forum:

Q. Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 or Canon 17-40mm f/4 L USM

Asked by Jonas Amund Jensen (K=204) on 4/3/2006

I've got the Canon 17-40mm L on a Canon 350D but i'm considering buying the Sigma 10-20mm instead. I'll be using it for landscapes so the 10mm sounds nice but don't know if the image quality can compare to a Canon L lens. Would this be a wise trade or would I be robbing myself?!

Jonas

Jeroen Wenting

(K=25317) - Comment Date 4/3/2006

http://www.nikonians.org/html/resources/nikon_articles/nikkor/af/wide_angles_shootout/index.html here's an article comparing the Sigma with several competitors (though of course not the Canon, as it doesn't work on Nikon cameras).

Log in to post a response to this question

Return To Photography Forum Index

Elapsed Time:: 0.109375

Your photo sharing community!