Photograph By sreeradha  seth
sreeradha  s.
Photograph By Rohan Sachdeva
Rohan S.
Photograph By Nanda Baba das
Nanda B.
Photograph By Wojciech Wandzel
Wojciech W.
Photograph By Jill Bartlett
Jill B.
Photograph By Mumen Khatib
Mumen K.
Photograph By Martin Paul
Martin P.
Photograph By Nigel Watts.
Nigel W.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Panoramic Photography Forum: 
  Q. using the shift feature accurately on the 135u

Asked by Bryce Hughes    (K=2957) on 1/19/2007 
I just spoiled myself with a 135u and it has the shift function, i'm not sure how many mm it is, or if they even make different ones? I keep reading 4-5mm. Anyway while i've had success with both straight and bent horizons i'd like to be able to include more foreground with a straight horizon. I thought that by angling the camera down a certain amount and using the shift funtion up that i'd be able to do that? but I can never get a straight horizon the the top half of the shot, it's always bent as if i didnt shift it at all. is this possible or am i dreaming here. I dont see any indicaters in the viewfinder apart from a bit of a raise in the middle, which i'd assume would be what the lense would see if i shift it up and not move the camera.. thanks for any help :)

An example is here, i know he probly shot it on something like a technorama or some other non swing lense camera, but is it possible to get the horizon here with a noblex??? http://www.kenduncan.com/images/1280/1280img.php?i=NX2375


    


Roger Williams
 Roger Williams  Donor  (K=86139) - Comment Date 1/19/2007
Congratulations, that's an excellent choice of panorama camera. I am not familiar with the details of how this model's shift function works, but the shift on most cameras/lenses starts with the axis of the lens centered in the frame and shifts it UP. This minimizes the amount of foreground and lets you get the tops of buildings in without tilting the camera up. With rotary cameras like your Noblex you must not tilt up or down at all, not even slightly, if you want to avoid bowed horizons. The only way to keep them straight is to have the camera level. If I am right, and the shift moves the opposite direction to what you want, try holding the camera upside down. The Noblex is supposed to be able to take vertical panoramas (although they look very odd IMHO), so it should be able to cope with being used upside down. Be careful it doesn't capture your knuckles, though! And don't drop it on its head!!

By the way, that's a lovely panorama shot of Ken Duncan's, isn't it! I don't think the swing-lens camera is the right camera for this kind of shot. For one thing the effective shutter speeds are not that high (my own Widelux's top speed was 1/250th) and of course the time it takes to swing will smear out any really rapid movement taking place in surf... I would prefer to try with my Fuji TX-1.




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.140625