Photograph By prabhasah kejariwal
prabhasah k.
Photograph By Mitra Nademi-Nassari
Mitra N.
Photograph By Art McCaffrey
Art M.
Photograph By Phillip Cohen
Phillip C.
Photograph By David Rodriguez
David R.
Photograph By Clay Boutin
Clay B.
Photograph By Barbara Socor
Barbara S.
Photograph By Gene Zonis
Gene Z.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Digital Photography Q&A Forum: 
  Q. Night photography

Asked by Christian Barrette    (K=21125) on 3/25/2003 
I'd like to do some night photography with a Nikon CP 5700, especialy cityscapes. I have to beware not to let the camera use the 400 ISO settings automaticaly, because the noise ruins the large dark areas. But I wonder about reciprocity. Is bracketing mandatory ? Is it true that a small aperture (to gain DOF) will cause light to appear radiating in a star shape ? With this particular camera, any suggestion on how to make long exposures without maintaining the shutter button down all the time ?


    



 Nita H   (K=548) - Comment Date 4/4/2003
A good tutorial for night shots with the 5700 is here: http://www3.photosig.com/viewarticle.php?id=671

But to answer your question yes, the larger the F value the more star like light will appear, a good compromise is to use a mid value like f4-f5 and a longer exposure. You can buy a corded remote (the MC-EU1) or use the timer so you don't have to hold the button down.





 Scott McFadden   (K=5663) - Comment Date 4/6/2003
Nicely said nita ,

Would like to add that you can create your own cabel release adapter by ways of traditonal screw cabel onto a metal bracket thats held there by the tripod socket(bend some alloy into proper shape to hold above shutter then drill a correct size hole and attach a washer to keep it through.
I had to write this since I forgot where the article is thats described it. try a search if you dont get what Im saying.
Also its a good idea to bracket since you are shooting digital.





 Christian Barrette   (K=21125) - Comment Date 4/6/2003
Thank you Nita, I've read the article you've indicated and found it very useful. Do you know if the remote allows for long exposure without needing to keep the finger on the release button ?





 Nita H   (K=548) - Comment Date 4/6/2003
When you have the camera set to bulb exposure mode (in "M" Manual), I believe you do have to manually hold down the shutter button on the cable release to continue the exposure. Otherwise you can only go up to 8 sec (? I think that's the limit, it's been awhile since I had a coolpix) by using the timer setting .





 John Charlton   (K=5595) - Comment Date 4/7/2003
Having just read this thread, I am a bit confused by the terms small aperture as used by Christian and Nita's response about large F number. Excuse me if I am wrong Nita, but my experiece has been that the star effect is a result of a small f stop, anywhere from f:11 to f:32 and that this effect would be quite reduced by a larger f stop of say f:4 or 5.6

The attached photo, also posted on this site at http://www.usefilm.com/showphoto.php?id=3241 is an illustration of this techniqe. I have not tried the star effect with my digital camera but I believe it worked with the standard lens due to the internal leaf diaphram. I'm not sure if digital lenses are controlled in the same manner.

Sounds like an experiment waiting to happen.








 Christian Barrette   (K=21125) - Comment Date 4/7/2003
John, I figured that "large" f values refer to the value of the number rather than to the actual aperture. F16, or f22, would be a "large" f value, but a small aperture, and a f2.8 would be a "small" value, but a large aperture.





 Nita H   (K=548) - Comment Date 4/10/2003
John Charlton is correct in his explanation of apentures. Sorry for my incorrect phrasing, but Christian is correct in assuming I was referring to the actual value of the number itself.




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.140625