Photograph By Salvador María Lozada
Salvador María L.
Photograph By mike cable
mike c.
Photograph By Ayan Mukherjee
Ayan M.
Photograph By  Dolle   x
Dolle  .
Photograph By Phillip Cohen
Phillip C.
Photograph By Srna Stankovic
Srna S.
Photograph By Danny Provost
Danny P.
Photograph By Margaret Growden
Margaret G.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Digital Photography Q&A Forum: 
  Q. losing quality and detail
rebecca claassen
Asked by rebecca claassen    (K=12904) on 8/23/2006 
how do i keep my detail and quality when I submit pics to usefilm? Iseem to lose a LOT of detail when I re-size my shots (logically) but was wondering whether there were any PS tricks to retain some detail.



    


Doyle D. Chastain
 Doyle D. Chastain  Donor  (K=101119) - Comment Date 8/24/2006
Hello Rebecca:
There is already a thread along these same lines which may be of some help to you.....
http://www.usefilm.com/Photo_Forum/1/1012838/

Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~





rebecca claassen
 rebecca claassen   (K=12904) - Comment Date 8/24/2006
Hi Doyle, thank-you, thank-you thank-you so much for helping me out here, I will give this technique a go and see how I fare. You're a legend! xxx




Chris Hunter
 Chris Hunter   (K=25634) - Comment Date 8/24/2006
Have a look at the two articles I wrote, they should help with specific tips and more general info.

http://www.usefilm.com/article-14-Understanding-Resolution.html

http://www.usefilm.com/article-12-Understanding-Pixels-and-Bit-Depth.html

Cheers,
Chris




Phillip Cohen
 Phillip Cohen  Donor  (K=10561) - Comment Date 8/24/2006
Rebecca,

A few things to keep in mind. For a normal, non panoramic photo, you want to make sure that the neither the image height or image width exceeds 850 pixels. If either width or height exceeds 850 pixels the server will once again rescale the image down to those maximums and you may loose some more quality.

That being said, as the other articles mention you want to reduce the images in steps. For example you have a large image out of the camera or scanner, for example a 3000x2000 pixel image. Do not reduce it in one step directly from the 3000 width to 850 width, you will loose too much information. I do it in steps the first reduction is from 3000 to 2500, then from 2500 to 2000, then from 2000 to 1500, then from 1500 to 1000 then from 1000 to the final width of 850. You can lightly apply unsharp mask to each step if you wish, but for sure you will want to add it to the final step. Save the final reduced image as a jpg using the medium to high quality level while keeping the file size under the site maximum. Remember some people are still on slow dial up lines and may not wait for a 300k - 400k image to load. So try to keep the file size smaller if you can using the quality level control in your jpg save program.

This process while taking a bit more effort will ultimately give you a better looking reduction with the most information.

Phil




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.15625