 james warden
(K=134) - Comment Date 5/27/1999
|
i think extra weight should be added to comments from those who have worked at PHOTO LABS !
|
|
|
|
 Mike Dixon
(K=1387) - Comment Date 5/27/1999
|
Middle-class children. Sunsets. Scantily-clad women.
|
|
|
|
 Jeff Spirer
(K=2523) - Comment Date 5/28/1999
|
Pets and Yosemite. Not usually in the same photograph, however.
|
|
|
|
 james mickelson
(K=7344) - Comment Date 5/28/1999
|
|
|
|
 Howard Creech
(K=3161) - Comment Date 5/28/1999
|
I'd have to vote with kids, sunsets, and tripod hole landscapes.
|
|
|
|
 Sean
(K=2) - Comment Date 5/28/1999
|
waterfalls, waterfalls, waterfalls.
|
|
|
|
 Trib
(K=2701) - Comment Date 5/28/1999
|
as a 12 year vet. I'd have to say any photo with the subject "bulls-eye dead center"
|
|
|
|
 John O'Connell
(K=2) - Comment Date 5/28/1999
|
|
|
|
 Chris Hawkins
(K=1508) - Comment Date 5/28/1999
|
Nothing! If photographing someone makes you happy, then do it. However, you might want to be sensitive about to whom you subject pictures of your cats.
|
|
|
|
 Tony Rowlett
(K=1575) - Comment Date 5/28/1999
|
People who are posed, facing the camera looking bored.
|
|
|
|
 Darron Spohn
(K=781) - Comment Date 5/28/1999
|
Check presentations, ribbon cuttings, award ceremonies, city council meetings, one particular high school volleyball player in Kerrville, TX (but she had great legs).
|
|
|
|
 rene
(K=102) - Comment Date 5/28/1999
|
In the words of the great Zen master: Everything, and ...nothing.
Grasshopper.
|
|
|
|
 james mickelson
(K=7344) - Comment Date 5/29/1999
|
|
|
|
 jacque staskon
(K=109) - Comment Date 5/29/1999
|
anything that is photographerd without passion becomes over photographed.
|
|
|
|
 Kenny Chiu
(K=164) - Comment Date 5/30/1999
|
Group photos of most kinds. Family photos are an exception. The rich or famous (people or place).
|
|
|
|
 Pico diGoliardi
(K=1327) - Comment Date 5/31/1999
|
|
|
|
 Robert Lyman
(K=177) - Comment Date 5/31/1999
|
Everything on the planet. The "things" aren't the issue. If your photography is redundant, then everything you photograph will be an over photo'd thing. If your work is fresh you will bring new life to your tired old subjects.
|
|
|
|
 mark lindsey
(K=1720) - Comment Date 6/2/1999
|
Here here! I agree with Bob!
|
|
|
|
 james mickelson
(K=7344) - Comment Date 6/3/1999
|
Ooooo! Artspeak. Lumberjack
|
|
|
|
 tom meyer
(K=2752) - Comment Date 6/3/1999
|
Where is artspeak? Oh it must be the use of "redundant"...it's got three whole syllables in it...t
|
|
|
|
 james mickelson
(K=7344) - Comment Date 6/4/1999
|
No Tom, it's the freshness of the redundancy not the redundancy of the freshness. James
|
|
|
|
 tom meyer
(K=2752) - Comment Date 6/4/1999
|
Speaking of redundancies, I seem to recall this entire thread from a bad dream I had... or maybe it was an article in Pop Photo...t
|
|
|
|
 A.B.
(K=2) - Comment Date 6/8/1999
|
The Pyramids... trust me :)
|
|
|
|