Adam E. J. Squier
(K=9803) - Comment Date 5/29/2004
|
I'd probably use some fill flash, but not much. Maybe 2 or 3 stops under ambient light readings.
|
|
|
|
Dave Holland
(K=13074) - Comment Date 5/29/2004
|
The catchlight is what you want from fill flash, so yes.
|
|
|
|
Bikramadittya G. Roy
(K=7202) - Comment Date 6/5/2004
|
When ambient light is soft, your flash may again cause sharp shadows, so better have a diffuser at hand, which will soften the flash. Cheers
|
|
|
|
BILL MAHLER
(K=5882) - Comment Date 6/5/2004
|
Hi Riann ...... As to your question on " fill light" at a overcast wedding. Here's my advice : If it's a lightly overcast day ... this is good. What i want you to do is .. read the light on the faces(cheeks) .. and do what the meter says. If your using 1oo speed film .. it will be around a 60sec.@f.4if it does not rain .. you will have a perfect day. ...If it gets darker ... a fill will help .. but will look like night photos...... Don't be unsure because of overcast ...... this is good. really. If you have to get in close and it's heavy overcast ... drop a handkerchief over the flash head. .. it will reduce the intense light......... Also .. once you read the faces and the overcast doesn't change ..... just use that setting .. till it does.... If i can help you more : write to me at ZACKFOX@AOL.COM.
~~~~~~~~~~~ Regards ...... Bill
|
|
|
|
BILL MAHLER
(K=5882) - Comment Date 6/5/2004
|
Riann .... one more thing ..... go deep into my portfolio and you will see wedding photos........ also if you want ... i will send you couple albums ... to brouse. send me your email address .. to ZACKFOX2@AOL.COM
Regards ...... Bill
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Eulalio
(K=3777) - Comment Date 6/6/2004
|
I'd use a flash. See the difference (attached: photo without The Flash, photo with The Flash)
|
|
|
|
Jeff Fiore
(K=11277) - Comment Date 6/9/2004
|
Gustavo, I laughed for 10 minutes with your post! Funny!!
|
|
|
|
