Photograph By Alfons Rial
Alfons R.
Photograph By Salvadormarial Lozada
Salvadormarial L.
Photograph By richard wheeler
richard w.
Photograph By Gary Dyck
Gary D.
Photograph By Michele Beccia
Michele B.
Photograph By a. Scarabeo
a. S.
Photograph By Gregory McLemore
Gregory M.
Photograph By Florin Pavel
Florin P.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Photography Help Forum: 
  Q. Sequential numbering for photos.... when using 2 cameras at a wedding
Matt Davis
Asked by Matt Davis    (K=3935) on 6/19/2006 
Hi.

I use 2 cameras to shoot weddings but have an issue with image numbers, when downloaded, not therefore running sequentially. (as per the days events)

How do others of you address this issue, if using 2 cameras?

In addition, even if you use one camera then how do you later re-number images for client proofing once you've removed any poor images - or do you just use the original file number and not worry about gaps in the sequencing?

For info I use a PC with PS7 and shoot with canon 20D & 5D. Client images are presented as low res proofs on CD - which is why I would like the images to run sequentially telling the story of the day.

Should you have any other ideas to add please feel free.

Thanks for all your help in advance.

Matt



    


Chris Hunter
 Chris Hunter   (K=25634) - Comment Date 6/20/2006
I think the easiest would be a batch rename using the automation feature of PS7. You can set PS to open all files in a specific folder, resize them, and then resave them to another folder with set names, such as the couples last name, starting with 1 and ending w/ the last photo.

I would just make sure to rename the originals as well first, saving them as full-res .tiffs with the same name as the lo-res .jpgs supplied to the clients, for easy re-printing later after proofing is done. Again, you could do a batch to complete this.

The two camera part is a little more difficult, but I'm sure there is a way to do it so that all images taken appear in correct order.

It would probably be something like having them both start of 0001.jpg at the begginning of the day. Then they will be in order, and stored into into folders like "JaneDoeWedding_C1" "JaneDoeWedding_C2". You will just have to make sure there is one different vairble to the naming of one of the camera's photos, to distinguish between the two sets of filenames. Again, this could be done w/ a batch re-name, simply adding a 'B' to the end of one cameras filenames.





 Ash     (K=9427) - Comment Date 6/21/2006
Matt,

I have an idea for you, I don't have two cameras, but I think that this would work. Part of the picture file should be a time created. It seems to me that if you put all of the pictures into one folder and used the sort by date funcion, all of the pictures would be in sequential order. I think that this would work as long as your cameras have their clocks synchronized. As for renaming them, I don't have an easy way to do this.

I hope that this works. Let me know.




Matt Davis
 Matt Davis   (K=3935) - Comment Date 6/21/2006
Ashley,

Hey - that's exactly the solution. Sometimes it seems so hard to see the wood for the trees as this is such a simple solution. My cameras are roughly synchronised (within a min or 2 I ecpect) so now I have th eimages sorted i'll hopefully just run a numbering batch in PS or other application which hopefully just takes the images in their current order in teh folder - i.e. sorted by date/time.

Thanks again soooooooo much for your response you've really helped me out here.

Matt




Chris Hunter
 Chris Hunter   (K=25634) - Comment Date 6/21/2006
This will work for SEEING the order in which the images were taken, but when you use the batch function in PS it will use the file name as a basis for what order the files are saved in (ie: 001.jpg, 001a.jpg, 002.jpg, 002a.jpg).




Matt Davis
 Matt Davis   (K=3935) - Comment Date 7/1/2006
Just for all your info - if interested, i found teh solution right under my nose.
Zoom Browser EX (which came with a camera I bought - I think) hs just the thing. Yuo can sort photo order by shooting date & time then run them through using the same programme to rename - hence all sorted now.

Ta
Matt




Chris Hunter
 Chris Hunter   (K=25634) - Comment Date 7/6/2006
Hey Matt thanks, i know this is useful information,

Chris




Michael Kanemoto
 Michael Kanemoto   (K=22115) - Comment Date 7/10/2006
Matt:

Mac or PC or Other?

Reason I ask is that you can probably write a DOS script to go off the date time stamp of the file, but you better have the date and time scynched across both cameras.




Michael Kanemoto
 Michael Kanemoto   (K=22115) - Comment Date 7/13/2006
If you have a PC, and do not have the software described above, there is another program that renames any file. It is called the Bulk Rename Utility or BRU. You can search for it and download it. It will rename files using search and replace and date formats, all the bells and whistles if you really want precision.

I just used it and it took about 5 - 10 minutes to start it up, play with it, and read the documentation on the finer points of customizing date stamps.

Since I use a Nikon and always want to tweak the filename to my own style this worked well to rename the RAW files before translation.



BRU Example



Michael Kanemoto
 Michael Kanemoto   (K=22115) - Comment Date 7/13/2006
Sorry - posting better example showing different names mixed with shooting (creation) dates.

Notice I also have a mixure of files starting with "_DSC". This is a great feature of Nikon where manual settings put the underscore first and auto settings put the underscore after the "DSC_". Really wonderful for those of us who work by date. Grrrr...



BRU Example Again



Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.15625