Photograph By Roberto Baez Duarte
Roberto B.
Photograph By Gustavo Scheverin
Gustavo S.
Photograph By Art McCaffrey
Art M.
Photograph By The Pilgrim
The P.
Photograph By charlie f. kohn
charlie f. k.
Photograph By Steven Hackett
Steven H.
Photograph By Kaushik Chatterjee
Kaushik C.
Photograph By Salvador María Lozada
Salvador María L.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Photography Help Forum: 
  Q. Tri-X or T-Max 400
Howie Mudge
Asked by Howie Mudge    (K=27933) on 5/27/2006 
I've only ever used Ilford Delta Pro 100, Fuji Neopan 100/400. Im looking to use either Tri-X 400 or T-max 400. Im looking for a nice contrasty film with some decent 'dirty' grain. The reason Im asking as I usually by in bulk of 10-20 rolls at a time and would like to know the benefits of one over the other, if any.

Looking forward to the replies :)

H


    



 Brian E. Chilson   (K=-474) - Comment Date 5/27/2006
T-max was supposed to be the finer grained alternative to Tri-X when it was released back in the mid 80's. My opinion is that Tri-X just celebrated it's 50th aniversary for a good reason - it has beatiful tone and a nice grain - you can push it well and processed in almost anything it is beautiful - although D-76 or X-tol or even the t-max developer work wonderfully - tmax developer has the advantage of being a liquid - but I like d-76.

T-max film can be tricky to get the process down just right - if you read the liturature Kodak gives you'll see that Kodak recomends an higher that average temperature of around 70 or 72 deg F. as opposed to 68 with most of their other films. plus the film is finer grained than tri-x so if you want that grainy effect - which I love- i'd go with tri-x.

just one guys opinion hope it helps.

Brian




Howie Mudge
 Howie Mudge   (K=27933) - Comment Date 5/28/2006
Thanks Brian this is exactly the answer I was looking for. I'll be ordering some Tri-x very shortly and as you say, 50 years is a long time to last :)

Im definately going for the grainy effect. If I want an almost grain free film I would use Neopan 100. However, I want that gritty grainy feel.

Your response has really been extremely helpful. Many thanks

Howie




Helen Bach
 Helen Bach   (K=2331) - Comment Date 5/28/2006
Howie,

What developer are you thinking of using to get a contrasty, grainy effect? I used to use D-76 1+3 for about 45' with no agitation after the first minute, with the Tri-X rated at 1600. I'll post some examples if you are interested. Rodinal is also worth trying with Tri-X if you want crisp grain.

Best,
Helen




Howie Mudge
 Howie Mudge   (K=27933) - Comment Date 5/30/2006
Thanks for the help Helen. To be honest, I haven't worked on developing the negatives myself as yet. I was introduced to photography through the digital format but I have since bought an eos 3, 1N and I am now working with film. I normally send the film away to get developed for me by a couple of labs.

I am looking into getting onto a course which will teach me how to develop my own negatives.

I would love to see some examples of Tri-X rated at iso 1600.

Thank you for your time and help

Howie





 Chuck Freeman   (K=13616) - Comment Date 5/31/2006
Tri X 400, Neopan 400. Tmax Yook!



Original "Slightly " Faded Color in 1980 shot. Very little P/S.



Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.140625