|
|
Verena Rentrop
{K:15233} 1/5/2005
|
for me the grain makes sense in this special composition...can read different stories in here...strong result...
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Car
{K:5704} 1/5/2005
|
A interesting accident!
|
|
|
|
|
Q Zhang
{K:3946} 1/5/2005
|
Great!
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Grace-Martin
{K:10183} 1/5/2005
|
Thanks! I was thinking it was a bit too smooth too..
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Collier
{K:19076} 1/5/2005
|
...i think I like the smoother version too...but perhaps with ahint of grain..kev
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Grace-Martin
{K:10183} 1/5/2005
|
How's this? (...smoothed with Neat Image)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q Zhang
{K:3946} 1/5/2005
|
Great story! But unfortunately, I don't like the grain. Babies and nudes seem to call for something smoother...
|
|
|
|
|
Marcy Massura
{K:1848} 1/5/2005
|
Funny and strong.
|
|
|
|
Dina Marie
{K:-1410} 1/4/2005
|
i think it is intriquing too.... not sure what i like about it... the composition and subject matter is cool.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Collier
{K:19076} 1/4/2005
|
perfect - reminds me of a series of photos I saw years ago taken with a 35mm half frame camera with the pairs of frames printed as one - with my old scanner I could scan 3 negs at a time and I posted one of those here on UF (two frames together) oh well i'll quite my rambling - love the image - Kev
|
|
|
|
Pat Fruen
{K:12076} 1/4/2005
|
Intriguing. I like it.
|
|
|
|
|
David Hofmann
{K:22223} 1/4/2005
|
interesting result indeed! makes a whole new image and idea out of two different photos.
You got some serious grain here. It is 35 mm? ...and people complain about their digital camera having a little grain at ISO 800 :)
|
|
0 
