|
|
John Kowalski
{K:177} 11/9/2008
|
Thank you for your comment and remarks.
|
|
|
|
The King
{K:4728} 11/9/2008
|
nice photo, but duck is too far, better as a close up on zoom, otherwise take the time and wait for a better shot, when you do take photos like these, never go less than a 3rd of you take shot, or don`t go 30% less of the object you are taking for the photo, but for this one you can only crop it to save it for better viewing ;) i crop it like this and up the coloure :)
|
Crop for better viewing and coloure up |
|
|
|
Debjit Ghosh
{K:3494} 10/17/2008
|
this is nice and creative work. nicely done.
|
|
|
|
|
John Kowalski
{K:177} 10/15/2008
|
Thank you for your comments Saad, Peter and Stan.
Yes I realize that the title is not quite accurate... but the duck was my initial focus on this beautiful scene and it stuck.
|
|
|
|
Stan Ciszek
{K:56854} 10/15/2008
|
Splendour of nature,John.
Well dan capture...
|
|
|
|
Peter De Rycke
{K:41212} 10/11/2008
|
Great you are being ironic .. the duck is almost unvisible in this "sea" of colourful reflection .. i think your composition is quite good, as is your depth of field .. i really like this kind of "artworks" .. Peter
|
|
|
|
Saad Salem
{K:89003} 10/11/2008
|
dear John,the subjects in the shot that you are referring to by the title,the Duck I mean is very small,and it merely visible,and it has small implication on this very nice shot of the pond,while the colors,and the very nice reflection on the shot are very effective to choose a suitable title from,my best regards,
Saad.
|
|
0 
