|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/5/2006 3:53:09 PM
I took it over a stream of water. For some reason there was an old wood board stuck between the stones and for some other reason the leaves were stuck to the board. So no glue was used! ;) I'm not sure about the shutter, looks like 1/30 but I think I remember it was a couple of seconds actually. Thank you for your unexpected comments!
|
| Photo By: Martin Wedelsbaeck
(K:294)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
10/18/2006 10:30:14 AM
Good idea. Perhaps it's a bit dark to make a "visible" print.
|
| Photo By: ol an
(K:-248)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
10/18/2006 10:24:27 AM
The post processing looks a bit unreal, like a montage. But it's easy to look at and I like the vertical framing. All the elements makes a 3D look.
|
Photo By: Nick Karagiaouroglou
(K:127263)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
1/15/2006 7:29:05 AM
Good timing  By 'traditional photography standard' an impossible capture, saved by a very tasteful postprocessing.. which makes me think of it as a very beautiful painting. Im curious how the unprocessed file looked.
|
| Photo By: Hugo de Wolf
(K:185110)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
1/13/2006 11:15:54 AM
This is your worst shot.
|
| Photo By: Anna A
(K:315)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
1/13/2006 11:14:48 AM
I like the weak contrast and composition. Suitable as a print.
|
| Photo By: Anna A
(K:315)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
1/13/2006 11:11:31 AM
Very nice reflection
|
| Photo By: Anna A
(K:315)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
1/9/2006 9:19:07 AM
I didnt like the red colour balance. Did you use tungsten lights? Here is my take on the subject http://www.usefilm.com/Image.asp?ID=1025643
|
| Photo By: Anna A
(K:315)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
1/4/2006 12:07:07 PM
I just think an excellent picture should have the 4th dimension in it. But that is a hard thing when photographing cityscape!
|
| Photo By: Hugo de Wolf
(K:185110)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
1/4/2006 11:45:11 AM
Good choice of lens and brave climbing. I dont really understand the UF rating.. There is no critical timing in this picture what I can see; it can be repeated quite easily.
|
| Photo By: Hugo de Wolf
(K:185110)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
1/3/2006 12:30:06 PM
It looks just like here! Damn airplanes 
|
| Photo By: Hidayet
(K:2772)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
1/3/2006 12:25:31 PM
The desert should be more visible. Dark. The sun is perhaps too low.
|
| Photo By: Hidayet
(K:2772)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
1/3/2006 12:23:04 PM
Nice colour contrast. I wonder how old it is.
|
| Photo By: Hidayet
(K:2772)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/29/2005 10:22:18 AM
Very unusual. Looks like a shower. Light blue is nice. Rotate it.
|
| Photo By: txules .
(K:62768)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/29/2005 10:04:29 AM
Velvia and no tripod?!
|
| Photo By: Vern Fisher
(K:36)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/28/2005 3:39:28 AM
The whole picture is dark. Would be better if only the opening of the building was dark.
|
| Photo By: Claudia Perilli
(K:31090)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/26/2005 8:00:33 AM
I think the light is a bit hard on the canon, which makes it feel like a 'divers documentation picture'. Nice timing with the fishes.
|
| Photo By: patrizio napolitano
(K:13119)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/18/2005 10:25:49 AM
I like the composition. Feels like two pictures in one.
|
| Photo By: ade mcfade
(K:12388)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/18/2005 10:22:22 AM
Nice work! I like to tone very much. I can see the clone spots in the sand, make them more random. 7
|
| Photo By: Marco Osorio
(K:728)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/18/2005 10:12:38 AM
There is an blown out spot, fix it. I would like a closer crop of the head. I wonder what it thinks.
|
| Photo By: Peter Carucci
(K:1672)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/18/2005 10:06:13 AM
The colurs feels too weak. I would like more color and contrast, or perhaps b/w.
|
| Photo By: Sherry Goldwasser
(K:25)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/11/2005 3:38:41 PM
Nice place you found! I would like to see more to the right. Shadows are perhaps a little dense.
|
| Photo By: Debarshi Duttagupta
(K:26815)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/11/2005 2:00:12 PM
Very cute! Here is my dog doing the same.
|
| Photo By: Dubravko Grakalic
(K:25235)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/11/2005 1:53:57 PM
The exposure range is too wide, it?s disturbing. Try lower brightness and higher contrast on the rocks.
|
| Photo By: Alexis Polegaev
(K:379)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/11/2005 1:47:26 PM
Nice! Did you blend two exposures or did you make some raw conversion?
|
| Photo By: Alexis Polegaev
(K:379)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/10/2005 7:21:27 PM
This image is overexposed from a technical point of view. The sky would perhaps look that white from a nuke!
|
| Photo By: Laurie Gould
(K:11942)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/7/2005 8:27:37 PM
It looks fun. Flash seem powerful, is it external?
|
| Photo By: Carlos Gutierrez
(K:1805)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/7/2005 8:26:02 PM
Good shadow detail. Is this two exposures or did you tone the sky?
|
| Photo By: Thilo Bayer
(K:50358)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/7/2005 8:21:45 PM
Easy to look at, which is a good thing. There is a spot in the top-middle part (top-right on the tree) which looks too bright, perhaps you forgot some layermask..
|
| Photo By: Balazs Salamon
(K:4)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Wedelsbaeck (K:294)
12/5/2005 8:38:50 PM
Man kan ju alltid försöka. Värt att framhäva kvalité som något positivt, de flesta bilder räcker knappt till A3 storlek nuförtiden...
|
| Photo By: Martin Wedelsbaeck
(K:294)
|
|
