|
|
|
Bruce Harper
{K:5305} 10/5/2005
|
Thanks Joanna, yes she is a good model - usually - even asking me to 'photo' her, but she does screw up her face sometimes when she is sick of the camera
|
|
|
|
|
joanna ewa
{K:8061} 10/4/2005
|
You have excellent model:)
and photo is interesing - because of different effect too:)
regards
|
|
|
|
|
micky waby
{K:9141} 9/16/2005
|
Hi Bruce,YES! YES! the original is gorgeous:)
it is fun to try out the different filters though.
Just catching my breath after a wonderful week onthe West Coast,will post something when i have a bit of time from sorting hundreds of images!!!
Micky
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Harper
{K:5305} 9/7/2005
|
Hi Susie,
It might be 'just your opinion' but I value it. After all to get opinions is why I posted the filtered image so thanks for sharing yours.
It looks like you ladies all agree.
|
|
|
|
Susie OConnor
{K:34798} 9/7/2005
|
I love the unfiltered image! There is something so innocent and sweet about her expression. I think it gets a little lost in the filter. Just my opinion. :)
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Harper
{K:5305} 9/4/2005
|
Of course I've lost the argument, she's my wife !
But I take your point, it is pretty harsh.
Here's the unfiltered image for you.
|
The image without the filter |
|
|
|
|
micky waby
{K:9141} 9/2/2005
|
Bruce you have lost the argument,tell Annette she has backup in NZ:)I think this style of filter is too harsh for such a delicate innocent child portrait,it would be more suited to a adult male as the effect is quite interesting.
I would like to see this image without the filter.
Micky
|
|
0 
