|
|
|
sandy c. hopkins
{K:17107} 11/2/2003
|
to me this would have had more impact without so much light.
i do like the arch though but not about the traffic,
i like how in trasit removed the traffic things..
nice idea..
:)
|
|
|
|
Massimo Di Maggio
{K:-53658} 10/31/2003
|
Nice shot, I like the metal structure, it's very curious and interesting and it adds a nice look to the image, only the triangle in the upper left corner is a bit distracting. You can't rate my photos because I'm not interested of ratings, but only receiving comments and sometimes useful suggestions or observations (as yours ;) ). Bye Max
|
|
|
|
Charlotte Shockey
{K:2146} 10/29/2003
|
Actually, Alex.. I do have the tip of the church in the actual photo just it was accidentally cut off when scanned.
|
|
|
|
|
alex hodges
{K:-21} 10/28/2003
|
Good photo, the traffic poles are great but you missed the tip of the church
|
|
|
|
|
José Alberto Jr
{K:133} 10/28/2003
|
this one is good too!!! this sky!!! perfect!!
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Allen
{K:3} 10/28/2003
|
The arch leads your eyes to teh church.
Good Shot
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte Shockey
{K:2146} 10/27/2003
|
Actually I don't think it's at all distracting.. I feel it helps frame the church and arch..
|
|
|
|
In Transit
{K:29432} 10/27/2003
|
The combination of the State House and the Arch is essentiall good...
but there is a slight slant... and then the signs, light standards, and the vehicles are distracting... although they are part of the scene...
IMO you could do some work with this one... here is a 1 minute fiddle...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte Shockey
{K:2146} 10/27/2003
|
It's part of the sign on the street.
|
|
|
|
ppdix
{K:17069} 10/27/2003
|
Nice shot Charlie, but what is that green stuff on the top right corner?
|
|
0 
