|
|
|
Mark Drago
{K:10902} 6/13/2005
|
very good.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 6/13/2005
|
Hi, Carlos. You're right about panoramas and the web in general and Usefilm in particular. The 800- pixel limit is very restrictive. However, for immersive panoramas, a subject I have just started to dabble with, the web gives amazing ability to zoom in and out and pan around, almost as if viewing the original scene. It is not an easy genre to master, and there's nowhere on Usefilm that they could be shown even if I ultimately prove successful, but if you're interested I'll send you a link when I have www.rogerama.jp up and running.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 6/12/2005
|
You're right, Keith. First it was candids with my mobile phone then more recently it's been fisheyes (and to a lesser extent telephotos) on my SLR that have been absorbing my interests and energies, not to mention my so-far largely unsuccessful battle with macros... But panoramas are my first love and I'm being drawn back to them again. I have a much better scanner for them, now, which helps a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Naylor
{K:13064} 6/12/2005
|
I like these panos Roger, you appear to have not been posting so many recently. This really shows the whole scene, much better than could be achieved using a 35mm
|
|
|
|
Matej Maceas
{K:24381} 6/12/2005
|
I'll also suggest losing the pillar, for much the same reason as Carlos - there's no such strong framing element on the left, so having the pillar on the right tends to unbalance the photo (although not completely: the crowd, which is mostly on the left side, provides a kind of counterbalance).
|
|
|
|
|
Carlos
{K:12969} 6/12/2005
|
Your panoramas tempt me to try the technique myself but for other purposes than posting. The powerful aspect of panoramas is scale and that kind of size doesn?t translate well with the puny limits of the web - a bit like watching Laurence of Arabia on a regular monitor! I feel likewise about landscapes but to a much lesser degree?
A panorama like this would do very well on large wall. And yes, I agree with the others ? the pillar should GO!!! Unless there was another on the left to really frame the shot.
Cheers Roger
C
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 6/12/2005
|
Super sharp shot, as ever, Roger.
Lots going on, but I think that I, too, would crop out the pillar.
Best regards, Chris
|
|
|
|
Paul's Photos
{K:35235} 6/11/2005
|
excellent panorama...love the shot...beautiful architecture.. great work
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 6/11/2005
|
Ken, temples attract a great many more tourists than they do worshippers, particularly a famous one like this. Some will cursorily "pay their respects" as they pass through...
|
|
|
|
|
ken krishnan
{K:19102} 6/11/2005
|
Roger,
Is it a temple. Looks jam packed by tourists.
Nice subject for a panaroma.
regards,
ken.
|
|
|
|
|
Galal El Missary
{K:84569} 6/11/2005
|
wonderful panoramic view Roger , perfect composition , regards .
Galal
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret Sturgess
{K:49403} 6/11/2005
|
I think it is a lovely panoramic view, great detail and colours, excellent composition - I think maybe the pillar is a little distracting
Margaret
|
|
0 
