|
Nicholas Byrne-Chinn
{K:673} 10/2/2010
|
Sebastien, are you for real? You seem like an angry, immature fool having noted some of your comments on here. Unbelievable! Critique sure but don't be a cock about it.
Do you two have some sort of vendetta?
Anyway, personally I think this is a cracking shot of a very cool aircraft. I love the exhaust capture!
|
|
|
Mirek Towski
{K:14880} 4/3/2009
|
Let me know if You would like to get it sooner but it is going to cost You.
|
|
|
Sébastien Anex
{K:1178} 4/3/2009
|
Not sure. Maybe on 1st of August 2357. I hope you'll still be on usefilm so that I can get a constructive critic from you.
|
|
|
Mirek Towski
{K:14880} 4/3/2009
|
Let me know when You will be able to do it. Do You think it will happen before the end of this century?
|
|
|
Sébastien Anex
{K:1178} 4/3/2009
|
I don't need this lens. My two main lenses (17-50 and 70-200) are sufficient for my needs. If I once have a chance to take a picture of these loud planes, I'll let you know.
|
|
|
Mirek Towski
{K:14880} 4/3/2009
|
Why don't You get the same lens and produce better images?
|
|
|
Sébastien Anex
{K:1178} 4/3/2009
|
You seem to have a lot of good lenses. Just shooting it whitout the 600mm, but an "inferior" lens would let more space to express something.
|
|
|
Mirek Towski
{K:14880} 4/3/2009
|
Let me see how You photograph an object that is moving at 500 miles per hour and than we will talk.
|
|
|
Sébastien Anex
{K:1178} 4/3/2009
|
I understand what you mean by freezing the motion. But for me that's a typically boring picture. I can't see any creativity in the shot. The plane is centered, has no place for expressing his motion. The lights are bad. Letting more space around the plane and taking pictures earlier or latter in the day, somewhere where there is a graphical background would get it better.
|
|