|
|
Chris Sitter
{K:2345} 7/5/2006
|
Thanks I will try both and compare the difference. I suppose I could also consider selectively sharpening to avoid the same degree being applied globally across the picture.
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 7/5/2006
|
Well, I believe that sharpness is subjective, until it begins to adds undesired sparkles to the image, as it did to the pines here.
One of two techniques to try:
- resize first, then sharpen
- A little less aggressive sharpening on the full-res image.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Sitter
{K:2345} 7/5/2006
|
I did sharpen and then resize......would teh result be different if I reversed the process? I had the same feeling with the final result but was not sure if I should then in turn degrade the sharpness. So what I am saying is I agree with your assment.......but is that a matter of taste? or quality? I am just curious.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 7/5/2006
|
It may be when it was re-sized, but this photo is WAY over-sharpened, Chris.
|
|
|
|
Rashed Abdulla
{K:163889} 7/5/2006
|
very great landscape and very pleasant image to view, all of the best my friend
|
|
0 
