|
|
arian berisha
{K:13697} 3/28/2007
|
hello MATEJ, I have seen your porofolio and all of your work is very powerful, you have documentet that film never dies,,,lot,s of love for photography and creativity is shown in your work,,,,,, best regards Arian
|
|
|
|
Olga-Eva Krajciova
{K:19240} 10/30/2006
|
Matej,
lots of your images I really like a lot, because they are somehow different from most of images at Usefilm - your images are really black and white, and they are close to me because I feel there Slovak soul as well. You have nice point of view to the world, like at this one, i really love it.
Musela som anglicky, nech vsetci vedia, ze si fakt dobry.
pekny den
olga
|
|
|
|
Matej Maceas
{K:24381} 8/2/2006
|
Hi Marco,
I fixed the print after the bleaching stage to make sure that the bleached parts will stay bleached, and not be redeveloped by subsequent toners.
|
|
|
|
Morc Piantedos
{K:21834} 8/2/2006
|
fantastic work, Matej! and thanks for sharing your tech info. A question: is there a particular reason because you refix after bleaching phase ? sometimes i have tried split toning , bleaching at first (and after wetting the paper, if dried) and after selenium toning but without intermediate or final refix..'i'm worrying now :-)
regards,
marco
|
|
|
|
Paul's Photos
{K:35235} 7/8/2006
|
nice work..like the effect from the processing.. good angle and perspective..excellent
|
|
|
|
Roland Lacson
{K:12214} 4/2/2006
|
Interesting perspective & like the choice of tone which compliments what appears like a vintage image. The inclusion of the sproket holes in the frame is a nice touch. Thanks much Matej for the comment & suggestion to my image, best wishes.
|
|
|
|
|
Matej Maceas
{K:24381} 2/16/2006
|
Christian, you touch upon an interesting subject.
The first time I printed on this paper (more than a year ago?), I didn't like it at all - the texture was just way too strong, distracting and unrealistic for my taste. I could probably attribute it to bad subject/paper match rather than bad paper as such... but in fact when I look at that first print today, it's not so bad even with that subject. Apparently my taste has been changing.
Now when I was pondering which paper to use for this forest photo, I decided to give Chamois another try. I can say that I'm satisfied with the result - the paper texture is in line with the texture of the bark, and gives it an almost three-dimensional quality when viewed at an angle; and the creamy base combines well with the brown toning.
|
|
|
|
|
Bryan Miller
{K:3395} 2/16/2006
|
splendid print Matej!
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Barrette
{K:21125} 2/15/2006
|
Well executed in terms of composition with the main tree emerging as a very strong graphical line. It's hard to evaluate the impact of the print - my guess is that the appreciation comes by a combination of the hues and the paper texture.
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 2/13/2006
|
Once again I stand in awe of your patience and your expertise. Even *I* can see that this is a beautiful result, well worth the effort. Congratulations!
|
|
|
|
Salib Cross
{K:1972} 2/12/2006
|
just great shot
regards
|
|
|
|
|
D A
{K:9} 2/12/2006
|
I like the tones and perspective.
|
|
|
|
Kambiz K
{K:37420} 2/12/2006
|
not a bad one.
|
|
|
|
JOya JOya
{K:-763} 2/12/2006
|
its good to see!
|
|
0 
