|
|
|
Elisabeth D'Amico
{K:6674} 3/26/2007
|
Alone in a foggy day.
I like this shot. Very nice atmosphere and tone.
Eli:-))
|
|
|
|
|
Violetta Tarnowska
{K:24497} 9/13/2006
|
Beautiful...
Viola
|
|
|
|
György Szönyi
{K:10011} 7/4/2006
|
And the old 300d is still very powerful! Gy.
|
|
|
|
|
Alyazia Khaleefa
{K:1168} 3/12/2006
|
hallo Carsten,
i know you are the one who can help me in this... remember when u tought me how to work with the levelz.. i've been doing so since that day.. my sand.fall photograph'z level has been edited n PS.. it was so0o bright... but check this one... http://www.usefilm.com/image/1068430.html
it was so0o dark and when i edit its level... it wasnt that good.. any idea how can i go over this??? thanX!
|
|
|
|
|
svend videbak
{K:7376} 1/31/2006
|
Fog is so tonally delicate, which is why it's so great to photograph in fog! One can never get bored by it. The work you have done is certainly not over the top. Colour saturation is the first thing one notices if it is boosted abnormally (Velvia, ugh!). The next most noticeable thing I guess is contrast. This is a very fine colour study of a tree with fog.
|
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 1/24/2006
|
Beautiful scene. I love the little branch hanging down, it really gives the tree character.
Mary
|
|
|
|
|
ricardo longhi-frantz
{K:9628} 1/8/2006
|
great shot, very peaceful feeling
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Ranke
{K:14476} 12/16/2005
|
Roger, you are quite right with the narrow histogram/ low contrast of foggy sceneries. The range of the actual histogram did not exceed the formal bandwith of the sensor - but I have the impression that even 16bit RAW cannot be dodged and burned enough without loss of tonal quality, especially in the highlights. I had to burn the fog tones or dodge the foliage and the tree, the latter would have been acceptable (but bracketing is always better, IMO. UNtouched shadows are not the same as dodged shadows, and the original light parts, exposed to the right, look better than burned, previously brighter tones).
Cheers
Carsten
|
|
|
|
Debarshi Duttagupta
{K:26815} 12/16/2005
|
Great shot....................... .....................................
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 12/11/2005
|
Not in the least "over the top" but I must say I am surprised it required so much work. The contrast doesn't look all that strong to me. I usually find that mist reduces the inherent contrast... That said, it is a beautiful and delicate photo with a lovely hint of warmth in the light coming through the mist...
Oh! Now I see you have posted one of the original shots. Hmmm. It was worth the effort but I'll let my original comment stand.
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Ranke
{K:14476} 12/11/2005
|
Shane, good idea. Here the shot +- 0 EV, straight out of the camera.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shane O'Neill
{K:3054} 12/11/2005
|
In future you should take a straight forward shot of the subject before you apply the many levels you do to get to the above end product. This way I feel that people will truly appreciate the effort and attention to detail you apply to get to results. Great work - keep it up.
|
|
|
|
|
Francesco Martini
{K:12249} 12/11/2005
|
..simple..and very beautiful...
|
|
0 
